Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Masonry Works

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AW/LDC/2019/0130 Property : [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], London SW7 Applicant : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] (UK) Limited Respondent : [redacted] [NAME]. Representative : In person Type of [NAME] : [NAME] under S.20ZA Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 for dispensation from the requirements to consult in relation to Qualifying Works. Tribunal member(s) : [NAME] [NAME] and venue of determination : 16 September 2019 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 16 September 2019

DECISION

2

Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion and grant dispensation from the requirements to consult [NAME] in relation to the urgent works required following reports of masonry falling from the building on 1 August 2019. The [NAME]

1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.

2. The [NAME] which is dated 6 August 2019 relates to initial protection works (erection of scaffold, netting etc), preparation of a survey to identify the problems with the masonry, and rectification works, once identified. The applicant says that the works were urgently required because of the potential harm to users of the pavement below the flats.

3. The applicant also states that, once the full extent of the works has been identified, they will use the lowest quotation supplied by contractors for the remedial works. No final cost has been identified on the [NAME] form.

4. On 16 August 2019, the tribunal issued directions, which required amongst other things for any [NAME] who opposed the [NAME] to indicate their opposition on a reply-slip and provide a statement setting out the grounds of opposition.

5. The directions also required the applicant to provide a bundle of documents, including any statements from respondents. A bundle has been supplied to the tribunal and it appears from those documents that there has been no opposition to the [NAME].

6. The tribunal has considered the papers provided and determines that it should exercise its discretion and grant dispensation from any further requirements to consult [NAME] in relation to these additional works.

7. The parties should be aware however, that the grant of dispensation does not mean that the tribunal is satisfied the works, when complete will be reasonable or the costs of carrying out those works would be either reasonable or payable by the respondents. The respondents’ rights under S.27A of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 to challenge the cost and/or payability of the costs for the works are preserved.

3

Tribunal: [NAME]: 16 September 2019.

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).