Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy to be £775 per month, taking into account the property's condition and local rental market conditions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for a similar property in the open market.
The Housing Act 1988, section 13 outlines the process for landlords to increase rents under assured periodic tenancies. It specifies that a landlord can serve a notice proposing a new rent, which must take effect at the beginning of a new period specified in the notice, subject to certain conditions and minimum periods.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a market rent of £775 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and market comparables.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HP/MNR/2021/0019
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 775.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 April 2007
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises First floor flat with 2 bedrooms and garage.
[NAME] of Decision 22 April 2021
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HP/MNR/2021/0019 Property :
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord : NK c/o [NAME] :
[NAME]
Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Dealt with on the papers
Date of Decision
:
22nd April 2021
DECISION
CHI/00HP/MNR/2021/0019
2 Summary of Decision
1. On 22nd April 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £775 per month to take effect from 1st April 2021.
Background
2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 18th February 2021 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £850 per month in place of the existing rent of £775 per month to take effect from 1st April 2021. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 26th February 2021 the Tenant’s Representative applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 11th March 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. Both parties submitted papers which were copied to each other.
The property
8. From the information given in the papers the property comprises a first floor flat with accommodation including a Living Room, Kitchen, two Bedrooms and a Bathroom. There is also a Garage. The tenancy commenced on 1st April 2007.
9. Windows are double-glazed but there is no heating system. The Tenant has provided the carpets, curtains and white goods.
10. The property is situated about 1 ½ miles west of the centre of Bournemouth, convenient for most amenities.
Submissions
11. The Tenant provided the Tribunal with a number of photographs which showed a double gazed window that had ‘blown’, the dated Bathroom fittings, the very poor Kitchen fittings and severely cracked plaster in one Bedroom.
CHI/00HP/MNR/2021/0019
3 12. There is no central-heating system, the carpets and curtains are provided by the Tenant.
13. The Tenant also provided with evidence of other properties available to rent in the general area.
The law
S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out
CHI/00HP/MNR/2021/0019
4 during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation
14. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
15. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.
16. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Bournemouth and Poole the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,075 per month.
17. However, the property is not in a condition that would command such a rent. There is no central heating, the carpets curtains and white goods are not provided by the Landlord and the Bathroom and Kitchen fittings are not of a standard that would normally be expected.
18. Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made:
Lack of central heating £100 Modern kitchen including white goods £100 Tenant’s provision of carpets £30 Tenant’s provision of curtains £15 Damaged plaster and poor decoration £55
CHI/00HP/MNR/2021/0019
5
TOTAL £300
19. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.
Determination
20. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £775 per month. This is the same rent that the Tenant has been paying in the previous 12 month period.
21. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £775 per month should take effect from 1st April 2021 this being the date specified in the notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets new rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1800 per Month for Assured Tenancy…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant refers a landlord's rent increase notice to the Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.
- The rent is set at a fair market rate considering the property's condition and local rental trends.
- The tenant is entitled to have the First-tier Tribunal determine the fair market rent based on written representations without a hearing.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No significant factors leading against the claimant are present in the provided similar cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £775 per month.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenant were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and comparable rents in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the lack of central heating were significant factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may expect a fair market rent assessment based on the property's condition and local market conditions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and evidence of other rental properties in the area were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
