Rent Determination for Tenancy Dispute - First-tier Tribunal Decision
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £235.38 per week for a property with several issues affecting its value. The decision considered the property's condition and layout, including issues like an unusual layout, condensation problems, and lack of soundproofing.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent taking into account the condition and layout of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the condition and layout of the property.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent for a property with several issues affecting its value.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £235.38 per week for a property with several issues affecting its value, such as an unusual layout, condensation problems, and lack of soundproofing. The decision took into account the property's condition and layout.
📚 Full judgment Official document
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AU/MDR/2024/0008
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 6A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [COMPANY] 45 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 235.38 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24 April 2025
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced Periodic tenancy
6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic tenancy
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord external structural
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none
9. Description of premises One bedroom flat across lower ground m ground floors, consisting of bedroom, bathroom, living room, kitchen and outside a garden
[NAME] of Decision 24 April 2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOAU/MNR/2024/0008
Property : 6A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Ms [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY]
Landlord’s : none representative
Date of Objection : 10 November 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] of Full Reasons : 24 April 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £235.38.00 per week month with effect from 24 April 2025. ____________________________________ *
Full REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
The rent determined represents the maximum rent the landlord could charge, the landlord may consider charging a lower amount.
Background
1. On 9 April 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £142.78 per week in place of the existing rent of £132.57 per week to take effect from 03 June 2024.
2. An application dated 9 May 2024 was made under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The tribunal on the 19 July 2024 wrote to the parties querying the jurisdiction of the tribunal in addressing the issue.
4. The tribunal heard on 4 October 2024, by video platform the preliminary issue of the jurisdiction, with the decision issued on the 7 October 2025 determining that the tribunal did have jurisdiction to consider the matter.
5. Directions dated 3 April 2025 were sent to the parties identifying the date of the hearing 24 April 2025 at 10:00am and details of an inspection to be carried out on the same day.
Inspection
6. The Tribunal did inspect the property. The flat is located on the lower ground and ground floor of an early Victorian terraced house. Access to the flat is through metal gates to a communal area from which the door to the flat is found, as is the door for the flat above. On entering the flat off the hall area is the kitchen which is located at the rear of the property. The kitchen has a sash window single glazed overlooking the garden. The kitchen has units supplied by the landlord. There is a considerable amount of black mould on the interior face of the external wall.
7. From the ground floor landing there is a short flight of wood stairs to a landing. The layout of the flat is inconvenient. The kitchen and living room are divided between lower ground and ground floors, separated by narrow, steep stairs. The landing divides and there is one further set of wooden stairs to a living room on the lower ground floor. This room also has a radiator, and as on the lower ground, with a single glazed sash window. A number of mice traps was observed. The floor is without covering. Also on the lower ground floor is a bathroom, this has central heating and an electric extractor fan, The room appears uninsulated, and faces over the garden, the windows are wooden and single glazed. The ceiling has recently been reskimmed with plaster, evidence of mould. Return up the stairs reaches the bedroom reasonable size to accommodate a double bed, the room is again centrally heated, the window facing the road is single glazed. The lower ground floor rooms are very dark
3 The applicant has shared use and responsibility for the garden, and yard area with another occupier of the building.
Evidence
Applicant’s Submission
8. The Applicant submitted an email to the tribunal dated 29 April 2024 noting a number of concerns the tenant had with the property, The tribunal has carefully read the e mail.
9. The Applicant submitted a completed Reply Form undated but in response to tribunal directions of 28 February 2025. The Form notes, the property is a two floored flat, over the lower ground and ground floor. The flat consists of the ground floor, a living room, a kitchen, and on the lower ground a bedroom, and bathroom. The property has central heating, double glazing, both supplied by the landlord, no carpets or curtains supplied by the landlord, white goods supplied by the tenant. The tenant notes the kitchen was replaced by the landlord in 2010, bathroom 1998, and a new boiler pre covid.
10. In terms of disrepair the Tenant notes, no soundproofing to mitigate noise from other flats in the building.
Draughty sash windows
Windows soundproofing minimal
Old plumbing and wiring
Garden needs a lot of work.
The tenant also supplied a number of photographs which showed the internal and external of the property, in some places damp and cracked ceilings.
At the hearing the tenant reiterated and confirmed the material within the submission, noting also that the garden was shared with the occupier of the flat above.
The Respondent Submission
11. The Respondent submitted to the tribunal an email, on 27 August 2024 noting the rent of £142.78 per week that was currently being charged.
Determination and Valuation
12. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition, and traditional layout would be in the region of £ 1700.00 per month.
4 The property has a number of issues that detract from the good tenantable condition.
First – the unusual layout and a deduction of £340.00 per month is made.
Second – the property has issues with condensation, vermin and the kitchen and bathroom are tired, and the property mainly has bare floor unsanded boards a deduction of £340.00 per month is made.
The net rent is therefore £1020.00 per month, which is equivalent to £235.38 per week.
Hardship
13. By email dated 16 August 2024 the tenant, identified various financial constraints including being on universal credit.
Decision
14. The Tribunal therefore determines the new rent of £235.38 per week. The tribunal is mindful of the financial situation outlined by the tenant and is satisfied that if the determined rent was applied to the effective date of the rent increase in the notice this would result in hardship. The tribunal therefore determines the effective date of the new rent as from date of the hearing.
Chairman: [NAME]: 24 April 2025
Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 9 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £400 Monthly for Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Gated Community Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent determination under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for the condition and features of their property.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction based on improvements made to the property over the years of occupation.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the condition and location of the property.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the condition of the property and other relevant factors.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the condition and location of the property, but this was dismissed.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £235.38 per week for the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and layout, considering issues like an unusual layout, condensation problems, and lack of soundproofing.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied to determine the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition and layout of the property, which affected its value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant, who requested a lower rent due to the property's condition.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and layout of their property when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and descriptions of the property's condition were important in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
