Tribunal Sets Market Rent for London Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the fair market rent for a London property. After considering the condition of the property and ignoring the tenant's personal circumstances, the rent was set at £1,500 per month effective from 1 July 2024.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The tribunal considers the condition of the property and ignores factors like the tenant's personal circumstances.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in London.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a property in London, considering the condition of the property and disregarding the tenant's personal circumstances. The rent was set at £1,500 per month effective from 1 July 2024.
📚 Full judgment Official document
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/MNR/2024/0358
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 17b [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME], [NAME], Valuer Member
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], Queen Elizabeth’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,500 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 July 2024
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable - Per -
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 9 January 1995
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the terms of the tenancy
8. Furniture provided by landlord or [NAME]
9. Description of premises A second floor, three-bedroom flat situated on [ADDRESS] set above a parade of shops. A living room, dining room, kitchen, separate toilet, bathroom containing sink and bath.
[NAME] of Decision 27 January 2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AC/MNR/2024/0358
Property : 17b [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 27 June 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] Member
Date of Reasons : 27 January 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,500 per month with effect from 1 July 2024.
____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 FULL REASONS
Background
1. By an application dated 27 June 2024, Mr [APPELLANT], the tenant of 17b [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (the subject property) referred to the First-tier Tribunal (the Tribunal) a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act).
2. The Landlord, [RESPONDENT], served a notice proposing an increase in the rent. The notice proposed an increase in the rent from £1,400 per month to £1,900 per month. The notice was dated 21 May 2024 and proposed a starting date for the new rent of 1 July 2024.
3. The Tribunal issued Directions on 5 November 2024 instructing the parties to provide all relevant information and submissions they wished to make in this application.
4. Following receipt of the reply form from the Tenant, a request for an inspection of the property was made and subsequently arranged for 27 January 2025.
The Law
5. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the 1988 Act, the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
6. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(2), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in sections 14(2) and (3) and any reduction in the value caused by a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Section 14 is reproduced at the end of these reasons.
7. In respect of this case section 16 of the 1988 Act is also relevant and this states:
“It shall be an implied term of every assured tenancy that the tenant shall afford to the landlord access to the dwelling-house let on the tenancy and all reasonable facilities for executing therein any repairs which the landlord is entitled to execute.”
3 Evidence
Tenant’s Submissions
1. The Tenant provided written submissions via the Reply Form contained within the Directions. They related to the condition and disrepairs of the property.
2. This included the following: • No central heating being present within the property. • Crittal framed windows single glazing throughout that are in a state of disrepair. • No curtains or floor coverings within the property. • No provision of white goods within the property. • Missing or broken roof tiles resulting in water ingress to the property.
3. The Tenant also states within his submissions that any rent increase would cause him hardship and result in arrears due to his low paid job.
Landlords’ Submissions
4. The Landlord provided written submissions via the Reply Form contained within the Directions. The Landlord made a statement setting out that rents for a 2/3-bedroom property in the same area are upwards of £675 per week. No evidence was provided to support this.
5. The Landlord also confirmed that the boiler in the property had been replaced in August 2021.
Inspection
6. The Tribunal inspected the property on 27 January 2025. The property is a second floor, three-bedroom flat located within a purpose-built block comprising retail units on the ground floor and residential flats on the two floors above. The property is situated close to excellent transport links and is located on [ADDRESS].
7. There is no central heating installed at the property and all the windows throughout are metal crittal framed single glazing.
8. The central hallway off which all the rooms are accessed has no floor coverings which is the same throughout the property. There also appeared to be signs of an historic water leak at one point in the ceiling in the hallway close to the property’s main door. Within the Tenant’s written submissions, references to broken or missing roof tiles were made which results in leaks. However, heavy rain over the past couple of days had not resulted in any active leaks that the Tribunal witnessed during the inspection.
4 9. There are three main bedrooms in the property with separate dining and living room spaces. Both the Tenant and the Landlord in their written submissions describe the property as a three-bedroom flat. All bedrooms are of good double bedroom size and are of similar dated condition throughout.
10. There is a separate toilet, and the bathroom contains a large sink and bath. Whilst the bath would appear to be original to the property, the Tribunal assessed that both the toilet and the sink units had been replaced in the past. Within the bathroom there are signs that the floorboards are deteriorating and rotting.
11. The kitchen has very old units with electrics that appear to be part of the original installation. There is a wooden door with single glazed panels that leads out of the kitchen to the external fire exit to the rear the property.
12. The lounge is of a good size but in a dated state with signs of disrepair (i.e., the electrics and windows).
13. The dining area is also of a good size and is currently being used as a storage area.
14. Whilst the property is in a very dated condition, the size is good with excellent transportation links. The electrics appear very dated throughout the property with the Tribunal assessing they appear to be original as well as there being a limited number of sockets available throughout the property.
Determination and Valuation
15. The Tribunal initially needs to determine what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. In doing this, the Tribunal will consider the rental value of the property and will not consider the personal circumstances of the Tenant, as that is not a factor envisaged by the Act.
16. Neither party provided comparable information for the Tribunal. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2,750 per calendar month.
17. However, there are elements in the subject property that need to be considered and reflected via adjustments to the market rent. This includes an unmodernised kitchen and bathroom, dated nature of the overall property, the dated electrics, and no provision of white goods. The full valuation is shown below:
5
£/month Market Rent
2,750
Less Unmodernised kitchen
) 10% Unmodernised bathroom
) 5% Dated electrics throughout
) 10% No white goods
) 5% No central heating
) 10% General disrepair
) 5%
1,237.50
1,512.50
Say £1,500
Hardship
18. Under section 14(7) of the 1988 Act, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix the starting date for the new rent from any point in time between the date set out in the notice of increase to the date that the rent is determined, if it appears to the Tribunal that the increase in rent would cause undue hardship to the tenant.
19. Within the Tenant’s written submissions to the Tribunal, he refers to the hardship that any increase in rent would have to him due to his low paid job. Unfortunately, no evidence was submitted to the Tribunal (e.g., bank statements or expenses) and we therefore are unable to find any evidence of hardship that an increase in the rent would place on the Tenant.
Decision
20. The Tribunal determine that the market rent for the subject property is £1,500 per calendar month.
Chairman: [NAME]: 27 January 2025
6 APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Any such application must be made within 28 days of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013. Any appeal in respect of the Housing Act 1988 should be on a point of law.
ANNEXE
Housing Act 1988
14.— Determination of rent by tribunal. (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to the appropriate tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the appropriate tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the appropriate tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. (3A) In making a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a [NAME] is liable
7 to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] 5 shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. (4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] 6 or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a [NAME], the [appropriate tribunal] 7 shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. (6) In any case where— (a) the appropriate tribunal have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the appropriate tribunal propose to hear the two references together, the appropriate tribunal shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before making their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. (7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the committee may direct. (8) Nothing in this section requires the appropriate tribunal to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. (9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.
8
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Semi-Detached House in Hornchurch
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Undue Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £2,750 per month in good tenantable condition.
- The property's unmodernised kitchen reduced the market rent by 10%.
- The unmodernised bathroom reduced the market rent by 5%.
- The dated electrics throughout the property reduced the market rent by 10%.
- The lack of white goods provided in the property reduced the market rent by 5%.
- The absence of central heating in the property reduced the market rent by 10%.
- The general disrepair of the property reduced the market rent by 5%.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The market rent for a London property was set at £1,500 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition of the property and disregarded the tenant's personal circumstances.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property was the central reasoning.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should expect a fair market rent based on the condition of their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and comparable rental values in the area were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
