Tenant Association Certified Under Landlord and Tenant Act
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal certified a tenantsa company under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, ensuring the association meets democratic and fair standards for its members.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenantsa company is recognised if it meets the criteria set out in the Tenantsa person Regulations 2018.
📖 What the law says
A recognized tenants' association is defined as an association of qualifying tenants (which can include other tenants) that is acknowledged for the purpose of service charges. Recognition can occur through a written notice from the landlord to the association's secretary or through a certificate issued by the First-tier Tribunal for properties in England.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The First-tier Tribunal certified a tenantsa company under s.29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal certified a tenants' association under s.29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, confirming the association met the criteria set out in the Tenants' Associations Regulations 2018.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference : CHI/00HE/2023/0002
Property : [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
St Merryn, Padstow,
[POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Association
Respondent: [redacted] : s.29 LTA’85
Tribunal Members : Judge D Dovar
Date of Decision : 7th June 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 1. This an application for the recognition of a [APPELLANT[COMPANY] under s.29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 by [COMPANY].
2. That provides for two routes by which recognition can be given, either by notice from the landlord or by a certificate from this Tribunal. The Tribunal will give such a certificate having regard to the matters set out in The [APPELLANT]' Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018 (2018/1043).
3. The particular matters I must have regard to under regulation 3 are (a) the composition of the membership of the [APPELLANT[COMPANY]; (b) the [APPELLANT[COMPANY]'s rules regarding membership, including whether [APPELLANT] who are not qualifying [APPELLANT] are entitled to become members; (c) the [APPELLANT[COMPANY]'s rules regarding decision making; (d) the [APPELLANT[COMPANY]'s rules regarding voting; (e) the extent to which any fees or charges payable in connection with membership of the [APPELLANT[COMPANY] apply equally to all members; (f) the extent to which the constitution of the [APPELLANT[COMPANY] takes account of the interests of all members; (g) the extent to which the [APPELLANT[COMPANY] is independent of the landlord of the dwellings to which the association relates;
3 (h) whether the [APPELLANT[COMPANY] has a [NAME], secretary and [NAME]; (i) whether the constitution of the [APPELLANT[COMPANY] may be amended by resolution of the members and the rules regarding amendment; (j) whether the [APPELLANT[COMPANY]'s constitution, accounts and list of members are— (i) kept up to date; and (ii) available for public inspection; (k) the extent to which the association operates in an open and transparent way.
4. Further, regulation 4 sets out circumstances in which I cannot give a certificate, which include: where the association represents fewer than 50% of the qualifying [APPELLANT]; or if it has a constitution or rules that are not fair and democratic. [APPELLANT] are defined by s.29A (8) as a tenant under a lease who is required to contribute to the same costs as another tenant by the payment of a service charge.
5. The property comprises 177 residential leasehold units. It follows that at least 89 [NAME] need to be members. I have been provided with the signature of 101 of the [NAME] indicating their membership of [COMPANY]. I am also informed that each of them pays a variable service charge.
6. I have read the Rules and Constitution of the association which provides objects and membership rights to all persons who hold a
4 long lease at the property and whose officers are elected annually from the membership and whose accounts are audited annually. In my view they satisfy the requirements of being fair and democratic. I also consider that they meet the criteria suggested in regulation 3.
7. On 23rd February 2023 the association wrote to the [NAME] requesting recognition under s.29. After providing their rules and constitution, the Landlord responded on 22nd March 2023 saying that they were reserving their position pending investigations.
8. Whatever investigations the Landlord carried out, and it seems they may not have done much if anything, no response was received and so this application was made on 4th July 2023.
9. Directions were given by this Tribunal on 20th February 2024, which prompted a response from the Landlord on 25th March 2024, in which they said they had no objection to the application; nonetheless they raised a number of queries regarding ownership and transfer of ownership by those said to be members of the Association. They have not provided any numbers in that respect.
10. On the evidence before me, I consider that the application is made out.
11. Whilst the landlord has queried whether all of the 101 members remain members, given that they may have transferred their ownership, I do not have concerns in that regard. The Association only needs 89 members to qualify. I have not been provided with the numbers of those who may have transferred ownership, but I consider it highly
5 unlikely that the number would fall below 89. Further, it is also likely that if ownership of a lease is transferred, the [NAME] would become a member. I also have to take the application as it is presented to me and in all cases that would run the risk that between the time of application and the time of consideration that there may be a fluctuation in membership. It is not possible to ensure a completely up to date snapshot of ownership and membership in any case. In any event, should the number fall below 50%, there is also power for the Tribunal to cancel a certificate under regulation 5.
12. I am also satisfied that the rules and constitution meet the necessary requirements.
13.
Accordingly, I certify under s.29(1)(b)(i) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, that the [APPELLANT] Association is a recognised [APPELLANT] association for the purposes of that section and therefore for the purposes of the provisions of the 1985 Act relating to service charges. JUDGE DOVAR
6 Appeals
A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] .
The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Five-Year Recognition to Rosslyn Court Residents…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Association Recognised by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Certificate to Tenants' Association
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenants' Association Recognised by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Certificate to Tenants' Association
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Five-Year Recognition Certificate to Tenants' As…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Recognition to Tenants' Association
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Five-Year Recognition Certificate to Tenants' As…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenants' Association Recognised by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Certificate of Recognition to Tenants' Associati…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Residents' Association Certified as Recognised Tenants' Association
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Site Owner Right to Inspect Park Home
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenants' association meets the criteria set out in the Tenants' Associations Regulations 2018.
- The tenants' association operates democratically and fairly.
- The tenants' association meets the criteria set out in the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
- The tenants' association meets the statutory requirements.
- A site owner is entitled to access the pitch to visually inspect the park home's condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to certify the tenants' association under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Who was involved?
The tenants' association and the holiday park landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant certification because the association met the criteria set out in the regulations.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Tenants' Associations Regulations 2018 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the association met the criteria for certification.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenants' association.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can apply for certification if their association meets the criteria.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the association's rules and constitution was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.
