VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tenant Association Recognised for Four Years

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate recognising the residents' association as a tenant's association for four years. The association must represent over 50% of the qualifying tenants and have fair and democratic rules to receive the certificate.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenants' association is entitled to a certificate of recognition if it represents over 50% of the qualifying tenants and its rules are fair and democratic.

Topics

tenancytenant associationrecognition

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.29Tenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018 reg 3

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.29

A recognized tenants' association can be formed either through a written notice from the landlord to the association's secretary or through a certificate issued by the First-tier Tribunal for properties in England.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal granted a certificate recognising the residents' association as a tenant's association for four years.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate recognising the residents' association as a tenant's association for four years, finding that the association represented over 50% of the qualifying tenants and had fair and democratic rules.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Page | 1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

:

CHI/43UF/HTA/2023/0004

Property

:

1 – [ADDRESS], Reigate, Surrey [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

[COMPANY] – [RESPONDENT]

Respondent: [redacted]

:

Recognition of [COMPANY]

Tribunal:

:

Judge T. Hingston

Date of Decision

:

25th July 2024

________________________________________

DECISION

________________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

2

1. The Applicant seeks an order recognising the [COMPANY]. The application explains that a certificate for a period of 4 years was first granted in 1992, and it has been regularly reviewed since then.

2. On 11th of November 2019 the last certificate was granted by the Tribunal under reference CHI/43UF/HTA/2019/0005.

3. This application was made dated the 4th of October 2023.

4. The Respondent landlord company has returned the proforma confirming that they support the application and agree that a certificate should be granted.

5. The only issue for the Tribunal is whether, or not, a certificate recognising the [COMPANY] should be granted.

6. On the 24th April 2024 the Tribunal directed that the Application be dealt with on the papers.

7. On consideration of the papers the Tribunal is satisfied that:

(i) the Applicant represents more than 50 per cent of the qualifying tenants, and (ii) the Applicant’s constitution and rules are fair and democratic.

8. The Tribunal grants the Applicant a certificate of recognition as tenant’s association for the property in accordance with section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for the period of 4 years with effect from 25th July 2024.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

3

APPENDIX

The Law- Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

An association which is a “recognised [COMPANY]” as defined by section 29(1) of the Act has certain rights concerning the management of the premises concerned: it has the right:

• to propose names of contractors for tender in a statutory consultation process carried out by the landlord under section 20 of the Act; • to be sent copy estimates obtained for the purposes of such a consultation process; • to ask for a summary of costs incurred (section 21); • to inspect relevant accounts and receipts (section 22); • to ask for a written summary of insurance cover; and • to ask to be consulted about appointment or re-appointment of a managing agent (section 30B). . An association of qualifying tenants may either be recognised for these purposes by notice given by the landlord, or it may be recognised by a certificate given by the Tribunal under section 29(1)(b)(i) of the Act.

In deciding whether to grant a certificate of recognition, the Tribunal must apply the Tenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018 (“the Regulations”). . Regulation 3 lists the following matters to which the Tribunal must have regard when deciding whether to give a certificate of recognition:

• the composition of membership of the [COMPANY] • the [COMPANY]’s rules regarding membership, including whether tenants who are not qualifying tenants are entitled to become members • the tenants’ associations rules regarding decision making • the tenant association’s rules regarding voting • the extent to which any fees or charges payable in connection with membership apply equally to all members • the extent to which the constitution takes into account the interest of all members • the extent to which the [COMPANY] is independent of the landlord • whether the association has a chairperson, secretary and treasurer • whether the constitution may be amended by resolution of the members and rules regarding amendment • whether the association, accounts and list of members are kept up to date and available for public inspection • the extent to which the association operates in an open and transparent way.

Regulation 4 provides that the Tribunal must not give a certificate of recognition in certain circumstances: where the [COMPANY] represents fewer than 50% of the qualifying tenants; where a previous certificate is still in force; and where the Tribunal is not satisfied that the constitution and rules of the [COMPANY] are fair and democratic.

4

By section 96(2) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (“CLARA”) “Management functions which a person who is landlord under a lease of the whole or any part of the premises has under the lease are instead functions of the RTM company”.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenants' association represents over 50% of the qualifying tenants.
  • The rules of the tenants' association are fair and democratic.
  • The association meets the criteria set out in the Tenants’ Associations Regulations 2018.
  • Works are necessary and urgent, and there is no relevant prejudice to leaseholders.
  • Dispensation from consultation requirements is reasonable considering the urgency and necessity of the works.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision granted a certificate recognising the residents' association as a tenant's association for four years.

Who was involved?

The residents' association and the landlord company were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant the certificate because the association represented over 50% of the qualifying tenants and had fair and democratic rules.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Tenants’ Associations Regulations 2018 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the association represented over 50% of the qualifying tenants and had fair and democratic rules.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can also seek a certificate recognising their association if they meet the criteria.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence showing that the association represented over 50% of the qualifying tenants and had fair and democratic rules mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.