Tenant Entitled to Adjusted Rent After Property Condition Consideration
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and local rental values. The new rent will be £1,852.50 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair adjustment of the proposed rent based on the property's condition and market conditions.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the property's condition and local rental values.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and local rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the proposed rent from £1,950 to £1,852.50 per month after considering the property's condition and local rental values.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00BC/MNR/2024/0280
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 19 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mrs S Phillips
Landlord [NAME] J & A [RESPONDENT] c/o [COMPANY], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] & [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1,852.50 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 27 April 2024
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable - Per -
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 27 April 2017
6. Length of the term or rental period Annual
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord 2 beds, 1 large sofa, 2 small sofas, 1 dining table with 4 chairs, 4 small bed-side cabinets, 1 glass coffee table and 1 small side table.
9. Description of premises Two bedroom second floor apartment based in a purpose built block of flats being approximately 15 years old.
Chairman Mrs S Phillips MRICS Date of Decision 19 September 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/00BC/MNR/2024/0280
Property : 19 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] & [NAME] [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [NAME] [RESPONDENT] & A [RESPONDENT] c/o [COMPANY] of Objection : 26 April 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 19 September 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,852.50 per week with effect from 27 April 2024 ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 13 March 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,950 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,800 per month to take effect from 27 April 2024.
2. On 26 April 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 26 April 2024.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by both the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the evidence submitted by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1,950 per month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments as shown in the valuation below.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
per week Market Rent
£1,950
Less Mould in the bedroom and general items of disrepair ) 5%
£97.50
£1,852.50
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,852.50 per month.
Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,852.50 per week.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,852.50 to take effect on 27 April 2024. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: Mrs S Phillips MRICS
Date: 19 September 2024
3
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Property Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £840 per Month for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,852.50 per month.
- The market rent for the property in good condition was considered to be £1,950 per month.
- An adjustment of 5% was made due to mould in the bedroom and general disrepair.
- The new rent will take effect from April 27, 2024, as stated in the landlord's notice.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,950 to £1,852.50 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the rent based on the property's condition and local rental values.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the local rental values.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be entitled to an adjusted rent based on the property's condition and local rental values.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both parties and the Tribunal's own expert knowledge of rental values in the area mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process and requirements vary.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
