VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tenant Secures Reduced Rent Due to Property Defects

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tenant successfully argued for a reduced rent due to ongoing property defects. The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,650 to £1,550 per month, reflecting the current condition of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment reflecting the current condition of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve notices proposing increases in rent, subject to specific timing requirements.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to reflect ongoing defects reported by the tenant.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,650 to £1,550 per month, reflecting ongoing defects reported by the tenant. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988, Section 13.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference : MM/LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0283

Hearing Type : [ADDRESS] of Written Representations

Property : [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : Referral in respect of Market Rent under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Member : [NAME], FIRPM

Valuer Chairman

Date of Hearing : 10 June 2024

Date of Full Reasons : 13 June 2024

FULL REASONS

2

REASONS

Background

1. On 19 June 2023 the [RESPONDENT] served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 proposing an increase in the rent of the above property from the passing rent of £1,400 per month to £1,650 per month commencing 28th July 2023.

2. On 23rd June 2023 the [APPELLANT] made an application to the Tribunal for the determination of a market rent.

3. On 7 July 2023 the Tribunal issued directions. These required the [RESPONDENT] to provide details of evidence on which they wished to rely by way of reply by 28 July 2023. The [APPELLANT] was directed to do the same by 11 August 2023 and the [RESPONDENT] was given until 18 August 2023 for his response thereto.

4. The tenancy began on 28 October 2017.

5. [RESPONDENT] and the [APPELLANT] have confirmed that the property has the benefit of a parking space and use of a communal garden.

6. Both also confirm that a new bathroom was fitted in May 2021, new carpets in the lounge and bedroom in 2021, with wardrobes provided in the larger bedroom in May 2021 and a new bed provided in August 2022.

7. The [APPELLANT] states however that generally, repairs are not completed in a timely fashion.

8. The Tribunal has had sight of an advice note from [NAME] undated and a witness statement from the tenants prepared for a previous court case and dated 16th September 2022 . These suggest that there have been a number of disrepairs affecting the property between 2018 and 2022. But do not necessarily provide details of the current condition. It is noted however that the [APPELLANT] continues to report draughty floors a temperamental boiler and mould in some areas of the property. No evidence of this is given .

9. The [APPELLANT] states that a typical flat in [ADDRESS] will obtain no more than £1,395 per calendar month and provides details of a two-bedroom flat although it was noted that these details do not contain any information on when or where the property was marketed.

3

10. The [RESPONDENT] in support of their proposed rent provides by way of comparable evidence details of a two bedroom flat in [ADDRESS] at £1,750 per calendar month. [ADDRESS] it is noted is a block of similar age as the subject property and purpose built as is the subject property.

11. The [RESPONDENT] refers to a previous reference to the Tribunal and claims that the [APPELLANT] is simply repeating the claims made then. He states however that many of the defects are now rectified.

Valuation

12. Following consideration of the submissions made on behalf of both the [RESPONDENT] and the [APPELLANT] and using its own knowledge and experience of the rental market in Kenton, the Tribunal finds that the open market rental value of a similar property in good condition is £1,600.00 per month.

13. Taking account of all evidence provided the Tribunal is of the opinion that while some improvement to the property has taken place in the last few years , in all probability ,some defects remain .The Tribunal therefore makes an adjustment of £50.00 per month to the rent to reflect continuing defects reported by the [APPELLANT]

14. The Tribunal concludes therefore that the open market rent of the subject property is £1,550.00 per month .

Name: [NAME] Chairman

Date: 13 June 2024 .

4

ANNEX – RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By Rule 36(2) of the Tribunal procedure, (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they might have.

If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with this case

The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the Decision to the person making the application.

If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Any appeal in respect of the Housing Act 1988 should be on a point of law.

If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAM/LON/00AE/MNR/2023/0283

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

[RESPONDENT] [NAME] 108 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1550.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28th July 2023

*3. The amount included for services is Nil Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 28th October 2017

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Mot

7. Allocation of liability for repairs The [RESPONDENT] repairs

8. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT] , bed , cupboard and white goods

9. Description of premises A purpose built flat comprising lounge , 2 bedrooms bathroom / WC with communal gardens and parking space

[NAME] of Decision 10th June 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment reflecting the condition of the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,650 to £1,550 per month, reflecting ongoing defects reported by the tenant.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in a dispute over the proposed rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the proposed rent to reflect the current condition of the property, taking into account ongoing defects reported by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, Section 13 was applied to determine the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's argument that the property had ongoing defects that affected the rent was the most important.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can argue for a rent adjustment if there are ongoing defects in the property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of ongoing defects and comparable rental prices in the area mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.