Tenant Wins Reimbursement for Service Charge Dispute Costs
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the landlord must reimburse tenants for costs related to a service charge dispute and cannot pass these costs through future service charges.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to an order preventing the landlord from passing costs incurred in service charge disputes through the service charge.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal ordered the landlord to reimburse tenants for costs related to a service charge dispute.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal ordered the landlord to reimburse tenants for costs related to a service charge dispute and barred passing these costs through future service charges.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AX/LSC/2019/0227 Property :
30-32 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicants : [redacted] [NAME] (2) [COUNSEL] (3) [COUNSEL] (4) [COUNSEL] [NAME] (5)
Representative : Mr [COUNSEL] (2) Respondent : [redacted] : Mr [COUNSEL] & Ms [COUNSEL], [COMPANY] of application : To determine an application under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the refund of fees, further to the determination of the reasonableness of and the liability to pay a service charge dated 11.10.2019 Tribunal members : Tribunal Judge D Brandler Ms S Coughlin MCIEH
Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 20th November 2019
DECISION
2 Decision of the tribunal (1) The Respondent shall pay to the Applicants the sum of £300 within 28 days of the date of this decision. (2) An order is made under section 20C of the 1985 Act so that the Respondent may not pass any of its costs incurred in connection with the proceedings before the tribunal through the service charge. The hearing on 3rd October 2019 (3) Further to the hearing held on 3rd October 2019, the tribunal determined that the sum of £8,300.00 is payable by the Applicants in respect of the estimated service charges for the year 2019/2020. (4) Written submissions were invited from the parties as to why: a. The Applicant should not be reimbursed in the sum of £300 within 28 days of the adjudication on the submissions. b. That an order should not be made under section 20C of the 1985 Act so that the Respondent may not pass any of its costs incurred in connection with the proceedings before the tribunal through the service charge. The Applicant’s submissions (5) That the Landlord should not be entitled to pass the costs of the tribunal proceedings to the lessees because: a. There had been no consultation with the lessees in relation to issuing a service charge demand for the period 2019/20; b. Once the demand had been issued, the Landlord had failed to engage with the Lessees in any meaningful way in relation to the lessees’ concerns; and c. The lessees were successful at Tribunal in reducing the service charges. The Respondent’s submissions (6) By letter dated 14th November 2019, Ms [RESPONDENT] confirmed that the Landlord has decided not to seek to pass any costs of the Tribunal proceedings to the lessees.
3 (7) No submissions have been made in relation to the reimbursement of £300. Reasons for the Decision (8) The Respondent was silent in submissions in relation to the reimbursement of fees to the Applicants and the Applicants were justified in making the application to the tribunal which resulted in a reduction in charges owed. The Respondent must therefore reimburse the Applicants with the sum of £300 within 28 days of the date of this decision. (9) The Respondent by their letter dated 14th November 2019 has conceded that they will not seek to pass the costs of the Tribunal proceedings to the lessees. This concession combined with the Applicants submissions persuaded the Tribunal that there should be an order is made under section 20C of the 1985 Act so that the Respondent may not pass any of its costs incurred in connection with the proceedings before the tribunal through the service charge.
Name: Tribunal Judge Brandler Date: 20th November 2019
4 Rights of appeal in relation to issues raised in this decision notice only
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
5 Appendix of relevant legislation
Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (as amended) Section 18 (1) In the following provisions of this Act "service charge" means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent - (a) which is payable, directly or indirectly, for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements or insurance or the landlord's costs of management, and (b) the whole or part of which varies or may vary according to the relevant costs. (2) The relevant costs are the costs or estimated costs incurred or to be incurred by or on behalf of the landlord, or a [NAME], in connection with the matters for which the service charge is payable. (3) For this purpose - (a) "costs" includes overheads, and (b) costs are relevant costs in relation to a service charge whether they are incurred, or to be incurred, in the period for which the service charge is payable or in an earlier or later period. Section 19 (1) Relevant costs shall be taken into account in determining the amount of a service charge payable for a period - (a) only to the extent that they are reasonably incurred, and (b) where they are incurred on the provisions of services or the carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard; and the amount payable shall be limited accordingly. (2) Where a service charge is payable before the relevant costs are incurred, no greater amount than is reasonable is so payable, and after the relevant costs have been incurred any necessary adjustment shall be made by repayment, reduction or subsequent charges or otherwise. Section 27A (1) An application may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether a service charge is payable and, if it is, as to - (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable,
6 (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) An application may also be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether, if costs were incurred for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance or management of any specified description, a service charge would be payable for the costs and, if it would, as to - (a) the person by whom it would be payable, (b) the person to whom it would be payable, (c) the amount which would be payable, (d) the date at or by which it would be payable, and (e) the manner in which it would be payable. (4) No application under subsection (1) or (3) may be made in respect of a matter which - (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. Section 20 (1) Where this section applies to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the relevant contributions of tenants are limited in accordance with subsection (6) or (7) (or both) unless the consultation requirements have been either— (a) complied with in relation to the works or agreement, or (b) dispensed with in relation to the works or agreement by (or on appeal from) the appropriate tribunal . (2) In this section “relevant contribution”, in relation to a tenant and any works or agreement, is the amount which he may be required under the terms of his lease to contribute (by the payment of service charges) to relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement. (3) This section applies to qualifying works if relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works exceed an appropriate amount. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that this section applies to a qualifying long term agreement—
7 (a) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement exceed an appropriate amount, or (b) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement during a period prescribed by the regulations exceed an appropriate amount. (5) An appropriate amount is an amount set by regulations made by the Secretary of State; and the regulations may make provision for either or both of the following to be an appropriate amount— (a) an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations, and (b) an amount which results in the relevant contribution of any one or more tenants being an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations. (6) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (a) of subsection (5), the amount of the relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement which may be taken into account in determining the relevant contributions of tenants is limited to the appropriate amount. (7) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (b) of that subsection, the amount of the relevant contribution of the tenant, or each of the tenants, whose relevant contribution would otherwise exceed the amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations is limited to the amount so prescribed or determined.] Section 20B (1) If any of the relevant costs taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge were incurred more than 18 months before a demand for payment of the service charge is served on the tenant, then (subject to subsection (2)), the tenant shall not be liable to pay so much of the service charge as reflects the costs so incurred. (2) Subsection (1) shall not apply if, within the period of 18 months beginning with the date when the relevant costs in question were incurred, the tenant was notified in writing that those costs had been incurred and that he would subsequently be required under the terms of his lease to contribute to them by the payment of a service charge. Section 20C (1) A tenant may make an application for an order that all or any of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the landlord in connection with proceedings before a court, residential property tribunal or the Upper Tribunal, or in connection with arbitration proceedings, are
8 not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the tenant or any other person or persons specified in the application. (2) The application shall be made— (a) in the case of court proceedings, to the court before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the application is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court; (aa) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to that tribunal; (b) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to the tribunal before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the application is made after the proceedings are concluded, to any residential property tribunal; (c) in the case of proceedings before the Upper Tribunal, to the tribunal; (d) in the case of arbitration proceedings, to the arbitral tribunal or, if the application is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court. (3) The court or tribunal to which the application is made may make such order on the application as it considers just and equitable in the circumstances. Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Schedule 11, paragraph 1 (1) In this Part of this Schedule “administration charge” means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent which is payable, directly or indirectly— (a) for or in connection with the grant of approvals under his lease, or applications for such approvals, (b) for or in connection with the provision of information or documents by or on behalf of the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, (c) in respect of a failure by the tenant to make a payment by the due date to the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, or (d) in connection with a breach (or alleged breach) of a covenant or condition in his lease. (2) But an amount payable by the tenant of a dwelling the rent of which is registered under Part 4 of the Rent Act 1977 (c. 42) is not an administration charge, unless the amount registered is entered as a variable amount in pursuance of section 71(4) of that Act.
9 (3) In this Part of this Schedule “variable administration charge” means an administration charge payable by a tenant which is neither— (a) specified in his lease, nor (b) calculated in accordance with a formula specified in his lease. (4) An order amending sub-paragraph (1) may be made by the appropriate national authority. Schedule 11, paragraph 2 A variable administration charge is payable only to the extent that the amount of the charge is reasonable. Schedule 11, paragraph 5 (1) An application may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether an administration charge is payable and, if it is, as to— (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable, (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Sub-paragraph (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) The jurisdiction conferred on the appropriate tribunal in respect of any matter by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) is in addition to any jurisdiction of a court in respect of the matter. (4) No application under sub-paragraph (1) may be made in respect of a matter which— (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. (6) An agreement by the tenant of a dwelling (other than a post-dispute arbitration agreement) is void in so far as it purports to provide for a determination— (a) in a particular manner, or
10 (b) on particular evidence, of any question which may be the subject matter of an application under sub-paragraph (1).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Appoints Manager for Residential Properties Under Landlord and Ten…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Secures Property Manager Extension Until 2027
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Dispensation Granted for Urgent Hot Water Tank Replacement Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Ordered to Refund Application Fee Due to Incorrect Service Charge …
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Allows Urgent Roof Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Drainage Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Administrative Fees for Ground Rent Collection
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £1000 for Studio Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - Summary of First-tier Tribunal Jud…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Sheltered Housing Tenants
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord conceded that they would not seek to pass the costs of the tribunal proceedings to the lessees.
- The applicants were justified in bringing the application, which led to a reduction in the charges owed.
- The landlord failed to engage meaningfully with the lessees regarding their concerns about the service charge demand.
- The lessees were successful in reducing the service charges at the Tribunal.
- The landlord did not make any submissions regarding the reimbursement of fees to the applicants.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The landlord must reimburse tenants for costs related to a service charge dispute and cannot pass these costs through future service charges.
Who was involved?
Tenants and a landlord were involved in a service charge dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided in favour of the tenants because the landlord failed to consult with the tenants regarding the service charge demand and engaged with them inadequately.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 20C, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the lack of consultation and engagement between the landlord and tenants regarding the service charge demand.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenants.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can seek reimbursement for costs related to a service charge dispute and prevent the landlord from passing these costs through future service charges.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the lack of consultation and engagement between the landlord and tenants regarding the service charge demand mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
