Tenant’s Service Charge Claim Struck Out for Lack of Jurisdiction
📌 In brief
A tenant's request to have their service charge payments reviewed was dismissed because there was no formal demand for payment from the landlord. This means that without a specific demand, tenants cannot seek legal review of charges through this route.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant cannot seek determination of liability and reasonableness of service charges without a demand for payment having been made by the landlord.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal dismissed the application as it lacked jurisdiction due to no service charges being demanded.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed an application by a tenant seeking determination of liability to pay and reasonableness of service charges from 2019-2026, as no demand for payment had been made by the landlord. The tribunal lacked jurisdiction over the matter.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Struck Out
© [NAME]
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
:
HAV/45UH/LSC/2026/0136
Property
:
8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
:
[COUNSEL] [NAME]
Respondent: [redacted]
:
[RESPONDENT] of Application
:
Determination of liability to pay and reasonableness of service charges Section 27A Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
Tribunal Member
:
Regional Judge Whitney
Date of Directions
:
2 June 2026
DECISION
© [NAME] This is a formal order of the Tribunal which must be complied with by the parties.
The parties must comply with the Statement of Tribunal Rules and Procedure.
Communications to the Tribunal MUST be made by email to [EMAIL]. All communications must clearly state the Case Number and address of the premises.
Email addresses and service of documents
1. All documents sent by one party to another shall be sent electronically to the email address provided. All emails to the Tribunal MUST be copied on the face of the email to all other parties in the case.
Background
2. The Applicant has made an application for determination of liability to pay and reasonableness of service charges for the years 2019 - 2026.
3. The application was received on 26 March 2026.
4. The Applicant further seeks orders pursuant to Section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
5. The Applicant wishes the Tribunal to determine the following issues:
• Responsibility for the repair of the roof and the resulting internal damage to the Applicant’s flat • Whether the cost of the flat entrance fire door is payable under the lease • Whether the interest demanded by the Respondent has been correctly calculated and is reasonable • Whether the Respondent should be prevented from recovering the costs of these proceedings through the service charge 6. Directions were issued on 6 May 2026 listing the application for a case management and dispute resolution hearing on 2 June 2026.
Case Management and Dispute Resolution Hearing 7. The hearing took place at Havant Justice Centre as directed and was attended by the Applicant and [APPELLANT] [NAME], for the Applicant and [APPELLANT] for the Respondent.
© [NAME] 8. At the hearing following a discussion with the parties it was confirmed that none of the questions being asked in the application fall within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction as no service charges have been demanded and if there is no demand, there is not a service charge which the Tribunal can make any determination as to the liability to pay or the reasonableness of the same.
9. The Tribunal therefore dismisses the application and strikes it out in accordance with Rule 9 2 (a) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 on the ground that it does not have jurisdiction in relation to the proceedings.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
10. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making a written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
11. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
12. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
13. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Environmental Work
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Appropriate Sum for Leasehold Enfranchisemen…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-Tier Tribunal Reviews and Corrects Administration Charge Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation From Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Alarm Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules: Leaseholder Pays for Necessary Air Cooling Repai…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Denies Appointment of Manager for Eastbourne Flats
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal rules on leaseholder's service charge obligations
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A tenant cannot seek determination of liability and reasonableness of service charges without a demand for payment having been made by the landlord.
- A tenant's application for market rent determination under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 is struck out if there is a binding provision allowing rent increase.
- A tenant is required to pay service charges for repairs of an air-cooling system if such repairs are necessary and fall within the landlord's contractual obligations.
- A tribunal may only appoint a manager if it is satisfied that there are breaches or other circumstances making such an order just and convenient.
- A tenant cannot refer a notice of rent increase to the tribunal if their agreement contains a provision for rent increases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal decided to dismiss the tenant's application due to lack of jurisdiction.
Who was involved?
A tenant and their landlord were involved in the dispute over service charges.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court dismissed the case because there had been no demand for payment from the landlord, which is a prerequisite for jurisdiction under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Section 27A was applied in this case.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The absence of a demand for payment from the landlord was crucial as it determined whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the matter.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant, dismissing their application.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone seeking to challenge service charges must ensure there is a formal demand from the landlord before applying to the tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
No specific evidence was mentioned as the case was dismissed on procedural grounds.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made within 28 days if permission is granted by the First-tier Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a qualified solicitor to understand your rights and options in such cases.
