VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a protected tenancy. They took into account the property's condition, location, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area. The rent was set at £9000 per year, starting from September 28, 2022.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent for a property, adjusted according to the property's condition, location, and scarcity of similar properties.

Topics

fair rentprotected tenancyrent regulation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1)section 70

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the property's condition, location, and scarcity of similar properties.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent for a protected tenancy, taking into account the property's condition, location, and scarcity of similar properties. The rent was set at £9000 per annum, effective from 28 September 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. JM/LON/00BK/F77/2022/0127

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] MA LLM FRICS

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 9000.00 Per Year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 28 September 2022

3. The amount for services is N/A Per N/A

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per N/A

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf) 7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same below the maximum fair rent of £9999.00 per year including £0 per month for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 28 September 2022

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 345.20

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 292.60

X 345.20 Minus Y 292.60 = (A) 52.60

(A) 52.60 Divided by Y 292.60 = (B) 0.17976

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.22976

Last registered rent* £8130.50 Multiplied by (C) = £9998.63 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £9999.00

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £9999.00 Per Year

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

Case Reference

: JM/LON/OOBK/F77/2022/0127

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] MA LLM FRICS

HMCTS Code : P-Paper (paper, video, audio)

Date of Decision : 28th September 2022

Date of Statement of Reasons : 28th September 2022

_______________________________________________

Statement of Reasons

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 28th September 2022 of the determined Fair Rent of £ 9000 per annum with effect from the same. By way of application received by Rent Officer on 11th May 2022 the landlord of the property applied for re registration of a fair rent, the being previously registered on with effect from 8th April 2020 of £8130.50 per year. The Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £9704.50 per annum effective from 28th June 2022. In a letter dated 25th July 2022 the tenant objected to the rent registered and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property). Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 1st August 2022. In those Directions, the parties were informed that in accordance with Public Health England’s advice to avoid unnecessary travel and social interaction for the time being, the Tribunal would not hold an oral hearing, unless so requested by either or both the parties, or would it inspect the property. Neither party has requested a hearing. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. In due course, the Landlord and the Tenant filed their written submissions. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. Following the issue of the Tribunals decision which was based on the written and visual evidence submitted by the parties that was germane to the determination of a fair rent, the landlord sought extended reasons for the Tribunal’s decision. The Property The property comprises, a non self-contained flat, two rooms, one kitchen and a bathroom/wc. The tenancy commenced 14th January 1974. Relevant Law Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended)

“Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.

(3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”

Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of (a) any

relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the [NAME] (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:

(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).

In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent.

Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions Landlord The application states the landlord is responsible for external, structural common parts , boiler , bathroom, electrics and fire alarm . The tenant is responsible for the internal repairs. Tenant

The tenant stated in their appeal letter, “it is non self-contained , and my toilet and bathroom are on a common stairway which doesn’t give me any privacy.” Reasons for Decision The tribunal considered all relevant material submitted. Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that such a likely market rent, if a market rent is adopted would be £ 18,000 per annum. However, the Property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent, a deduction of 10% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions and goods supplied under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparable are derived. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. Finally the non-self-contained element attracted a discount of 10%. Market derived rental level - £18,000 per year Less 10% condition Less 10% for terms and supplied goods inc white goods Less 20% for scarcity. Non self-contained element 10% After the final adjustment was £9000 per year.

Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 The rent to be registered is limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £9999.00 per year. This figure is less than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments of £9000.00 per year.

Accordingly, the sum of £9000.00 per year will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 28th September 2022, being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 28th September 2022

Extended reasons: 28th September 2022

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was set at £9000 per year, as determined by the Tribunal.
  • The property's condition required a 10% deduction from the market rent.
  • The tenancy terms and supplied goods, different from modern tenancies, led to a 10% deduction.
  • A 20% deduction was applied for scarcity of similar properties in the area.
  • The non-self-contained nature of the flat resulted in a 10% discount.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent of £9000 per year for a protected tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition, location, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and related regulations were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The scarcity of similar properties in the area was a key factor in determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also be able to get a fair rent based on the condition and location of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence about the property's condition and the local rental market was important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.