VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £48,600 for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £48,600 per year for a property in London. This decision was made under the Rent Act 1977, considering factors like the property's condition and local market conditions.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, taking into account the current market conditions and the property's characteristics.

Topics

fair rent determinationRent Act 1977maximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering various factors including rental comparables and adjustments for amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £48,600 per year for a property located at 45 Acacia Road, London NW8 6AP, under the Rent Act 1977. The decision took into account the current market conditions and the property's characteristics, including adjustments for amenities.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/OOBK/F77/2025/0105

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 45 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord

[NAME]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £48,600 Per year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 20 May 2025

3. The amount for services is

Per

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was ....................................................................................................................................................................... per week .......................... including .......................... per week ........................ for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £50 016.50 .... per week ........... including £ ......................................... per week ........................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 20 May 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 395.3

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 345.2

X 395.3 Minus Y 345.2 = (A) 50.1

(A) 50.1 Divided by Y 345.27 = (B) 0.14513

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.29426

Last registered rent* 41850.00 Multiplied by (C) = 50016.33 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 50016.33

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £50016.50 Per year

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOBK/F77/2025/0105

Property : 45 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 28 January 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Reasons

: 20 May 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £48,600.00 per year will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 20 May 2025, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS

Background

1. Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

3. The landlord has provided written submissions noting on the reply form that central heating, carpets, curtains and white goods are provided by the tenant.

4. The representations start by comparing the new registration with the previous registration but unfortunately use incorrect figures. The representations include details of 3 comparable lettings in the immediate vicinity. The subject house is described as a house having a floor area of 2250 ft.²

58 a [ADDRESS] was let on 28 August 2025 at a rent of £169,000 per year. Houses is said to have a floor area of 3253 ft.² and the rent represents £52 per square foot. The terms of the tenancy are not given.

[ADDRESS] was let on 1 September 2023 as a rent of £312,000 per year representing £92.47 per square foot on the floor area of 3374 ft.². Again the terms of the tenancy are not given.

[ADDRESS] was let on 15 January 2023 as a rent of £124,000 per year house is set floor area of 2034 ft.² representing £61.36 per square foot . The terms of the tenancy have not been given.

5. There are no representations from the tenant.

Determination and Valuation

6. In the absence of the terms of the tenancies of the rental comparables provided by the landlord, the tribunal is unable to place any weight on that evidence. The tribunal has relied on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area. We consider that the open market rent for the property on a standard assured shorthold tenancy, in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £135,000 per year. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

3

a. No carpets curtains or white goods b. No central heating c. a full repairing lease

The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

7. The full valuation is shown below:

8. The Tribunal determines a s70 rent of £48,600.00 per year.

Decision

9. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £48,600.00 per year. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £50016.50 per year. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £48,600.00 per year is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 20 May 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

Fair rent PCM Market rent 135,000.00 £ FRI no CH 55% 74,250.00 -£ adjusted rent 60,750.00 £ less scarcity off adj rent 20% 12,150.00 -£ Fair rent 48,600.00 £

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is adjusted based on the Retail Price Index.
  • The rent takes into account the property's condition.
  • The rent considers local market conditions.
  • The rent is determined by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.
  • The rent is assessed considering the property's value.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £48,600 per year for a property in London.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the current market conditions and the property's characteristics, making necessary adjustments for amenities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's value with similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that reflects the property's value.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the current market conditions and the property's characteristics.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included rental comparables and details about the property's condition and amenities.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.