Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Flat at £2230 Per Month
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a flat, setting it at £2230 per month starting from April 1, 2022. The tribunal took into account the flat's condition and amenities when a person their decision.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent assessment by the tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the market rent for a flat based on its valuation and experience.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a flat at £2230 per month, effective from April 1, 2022. The tribunal relied on its knowledge and experience, considering the property's condition and amenities.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MNR/2022/0060
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [NAME] c/o [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 2350 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2022
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 November 2013
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement and S11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises a first floor purpose built flat with a living room/kitchen, 2 bedrooms and bathroom/WC
[NAME] of Decision 13 July 2022
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BK/MNR/2022/0060 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) :
P: PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] of [NAME] : Market Rent under ss13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :
[NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 20 June 2022 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 13 July 2022
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was CVP: CVPREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because all issues could be determined on at a video hearing followed by an inspection at the tenants request. The documents that the tribunal was referred to are the notice of increase, the [NAME] and covering correspondence from both parties, the contents of which the tribunal have noted. The tribunal inspected following the hearing. Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £2230.00 (two thousand two hundred and thirty pounds) per calendar month to take effect from 1 April 2022. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The [NAME]
1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice of increase dated 21 February 2022 proposing a new rent of £1800.39 per month in place of the existing rent of £1692.10 per month to take effect from 1 April 2022. The tribunal issued directions on 22 April 2022 which were amended on 30 May 2022. The property 2. The subject property is a first floor flat with a living room/kitchen, 2 bedrooms and bathroom. The Tenant’s evidence 3. The tenant’s [NAME] was received by the tribunal on 28 March 2022. Submissions included the landlords increase notice, correspondence regarding disrepair and a complaint using the Landlords complaints procedure. No comparables were provided. The Tenants submission also included a number of photographs which were not dated or titled and therefore of little evidential value.
4. The correspondence relating to repair is dated 2021. No reply form was included. The papers also asked if the tribunal could value on an intermediate rent basis.
The landlord’s evidence 5. The landlord provided a standard reply form confirming details of the accommodation but no other evidence. The Law 6. Section 14 the Housing Act 1988, allows a tenant who has received a notice of increase to apply to the tribunal for a determination of the rent which in the tribunal’s opinion the rent at which the dwelling might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as the tenancy, beginning at the beginning of the notice period and on the same terms other than the amount of rent as are contained in the tenancy. Valuation 7. The tribunal has no jurisdiction to rule on disputes relating to past disrepair or inherent defects. In the absence of detailed evidence of current disrepair, the tribunal will value on the assumption that the property is in a reasonable state of repair. The tribunal can only value on a market rent basis under the Act and not on an intermediate rent basis.
8. As no rental evidence has been provided by the parties the tribunal relies on its knowledge and experience. The tribunal has considered the submissions and evidence regarding the condition of the property.
9. The tribunal considers that this flat, let in the market on an AST, unfurnished and with the usual amenities on normal market terms in the condition the market would expect would achieve a rent of £2350.00 per month The tribunal then deducted 5% for the absence of carpets curtains and white goods to come to a net rent of say £2230.00 per month.
10. No evidence of hardship has been provided so the rent increase takes effect from the date set out in the notice of increase.
Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 13 July 2022
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Ground-Floor Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Open Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Lower Rent in First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Lower Market Rent for Unmodernised Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decis…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent assessment by the tribunal.
- The property's condition and lack of modernization justify a reduced rent.
- Rent adjustments should reflect the actual condition of the property.
- Tenants are entitled to rent determinations under relevant housing acts.
- Improvements made by the tenant should be considered in rent assessments.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set the market rent for a flat at £2230 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on its knowledge and experience, considering the flat's condition and amenities.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition and amenities of the flat.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and amenities of their property when seeking a market rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and descriptions of the property's condition were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
