VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, fixing the weekly rent at £98.66, which includes water rates but excludes council tax. This decision applies from 4 April 2022.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy as per Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the weekly rent at £98.66, excluding council tax but including water rates. The decision took effect on 4 April 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CM/MNR/2022/0062

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 13 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT], 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £98.66 Per Week (excluding council tax but including water rates of £8.17 pw and any amount in box 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 4 April 2022

3. The amount included for services is £2.96 Per week

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 July 2015

5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Standard

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Maisonette in a block on 2nd & 3rd floors, accessed vi common external stairs. Accommodation comprise 1 Reception, Kitchen, 3 x Bedrooms, bathroom, heated by district heating system. No garden

[NAME] of Decision 25 August 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy as per Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £98.66 per week.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which requires a register of rents for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation of the rent according to the statutory requirements.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent complies with statutory requirements.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as tenancy agreements and previous rent records were likely considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.