Tribunal Upholds Landlord's Proposed Rent Increase
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal upheld a landlord's proposal to increase the rent to £2,150 per month, stating that this amount reflects the current market value of the property under an assured tenancy.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the open market value of the property under an assured tenancy.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal upheld the landlord's proposed rent increase under the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal upheld a landlord's proposed rent increase of £2,150 per calendar month, finding it reasonable for the property to let in the open market under an assured tenancy.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BG/MNR/2024/0605
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Mr N [NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 2150 Per pcm
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 November 2024
*3. The amount included for services is nil Per Calendar month
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included n/a
5. Date assured tenancy commenced April 2023 rolling
6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly periodic
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Sofa, centre table, dining table, desk
9. Description of premises Purpose Built second floor flat 2000’s in block of similar. Located in Bow. Block is low rise 4 residential levels. Brick wall steel glass finishes, flat roof assumed. Property is living room/ kitchen, 2 bedrooms, bath/wc. Double glazed windows central heating.. The Landlord may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of the figure shown at box 1.
Chairman N [NAME] of Decision 19 March 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BG/MNR/2025/0605 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] : None Respondent : [redacted] Representative : [COUNSEL] J. [COUNSEL] (Agent) Type of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members :
[NAME] [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 19 March 2025
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application dated 13 November 2024 from the [APPELLANT] of the Property, regarding a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).
2 The notice, dated 14 October 2024, proposed a new rent of £2150 per calendar month, with effect from and including 28 November 2024. The passing rent was said to be £1595 per calendar month.
2 3 The tenancy is an assured shorthold periodic monthly tenancy. A copy of the last tenancy agreement was provided and was rolling on from April 2023 the initial term having expired.
4 Directions were issued 23 January 2024. Neither party requested a hearing. The Tribunal does not routinely carry out inspections.
5 The Tribunal received an initial application. The Tribunal sent out its standard Reply Form to both landlord and [APPELLANT]. The Tribunal received no response from either party.
Property
6 The Property is a c.2010’s new build part of a larger purpose built block of flats to 4 levels, plus basement. Brick fair faced external walls, metal and glass. Accommodation in the Property on the third level, comprised 2 bedrooms, living room/ kitchen and bathroom/ wc. There was double glazing, central heating, white goods, and furniture included sofa, tables and a desk and floor coverings.
7 The Tribunal had regard to Google Streetview (data capture July 2022). Neither party referred the Tribunal to similar properties let or to let.
Law
8 In accordance with the terms of S.14 of the Housing Act 1988 we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to [APPELLANT]’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the [APPELLANT]’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the Property falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that the Property to be in a reasonable internal decorative condition.
Decision
9 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in Bow it determines that the subject Property would let on a normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £2,150 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order and makes no deductions. The rent of this Property is therefore determined at £2,150 pcm.
10 The new rent will take effect from and including 28 November 2024, the effective start date given in the landlord’s Notice. As the Form of Determination states: The Landlord is not obliged but, may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of, the figure shown at box 1; £2,150 pcm.
Name: [NAME]: 19 March 2025
3
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.
Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013).
If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Studio Flat in Gipsy Hill
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Small Rural Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Social Housing Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for New Flat in High Wycombe
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Confirms Rent Increase for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced for Tenant Due to Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent that reflects the property's condition and market comparables.
- A fair rent is based on current market conditions and the property's condition.
- Rent should reflect the open market value, adjusted for the property’s condition and amenities.
- The rent level must reflect the open market value, considering the property’s condition and amenities.
- Fair market rent takes into account the property’s condition and local rental rates.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal upheld the landlord's proposed rent increase to £2,150 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant challenged the landlord's proposed rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the proposed rent increase was reasonable based on the open market value of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the open market value of the property under an assured tenancy.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should expect their rent increase challenge to be evaluated based on the open market value of the property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and the property description were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent increases.
