
Human Rights judgments from Canadian courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal granted a confidentiality order to protect the safety of an inmate. The order was made to ensure that sensitive information in a document would not jeopardize the inmate's security. This decision reflects the balance between transparency and protecting individual safety.
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that a regulation excluding certain immigrants from eligibility for childcare subsidies discriminates based on sex and immigration status, violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms' equality rights.
A worker in the Department of National Defence successfully argued that she was harassed by her supervisor, but her request for accommodation due to a medical condition under a mandatory vaccination policy was denied by the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board.
In this case, the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) decided not to investigate a human rights complaint because the issues were already addressed through previous arbitration. The Federal Court agreed with the CHRC's decision, stating that the complaint was not dealt with as the issues were already resolved in arbitration.
The Federal Court of Appeal overturned a decision by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, ruling that the Board's conclusion that an employee's conduct did not constitute sexual harassment was unreasonable. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to established case law when evaluating claims of sexual harassment in the workplace.
The Federal Court dismissed a lawsuit brought by workers against a government agency for systemic negligence. The Court found that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case due to statutory bars under the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act. The workers were advised to pursue their grievances through the proper channels outlined in the Public Service Staff Relations Act.
The Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board dismissed a complaint alleging abuse of authority due to discrimination. The complainant argued that the employer's use of a non-advertised appointment process was discriminatory. The Board concluded that the complainant did not prove discrimination.
The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal decided to split the case into two parts. They will hear the discrimination allegations but will wait for the Federal Court of Appeal's decision on the retaliation allegations before proceeding with those.