VadeLab
DismissedSocial Security Tribunal of Canada (Old Age Security / GIS)·

Claimant Loses Appeal to Recalculate GIS Based on Estimated Income

Case No. 2026 SST 162 · Member Wayne van der Meide

📌 In brief

The Social Security Tribunal of Canada dismissed the claimant's appeal for Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) eligibility based on estimated income for July 2025 to June 2026. The tribunal ruled that the claimant was not entitled to have her GIS recalculated because she did not cease carrying on a business, even though her income had declined.

⚖️ Legal holding

A person is not entitled to have their Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) recalculated based on an estimate of their current year's income if they continue to carry on a business, even if their income has declined.

Topics

Old Age SecurityGuaranteed Income SupplementIncome Estimation

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Old Age Security Act s.14 — Statement of income to be made

When applying for a supplement, a person must state their income from the previous calendar year. The Minister can sometimes estimate a person's income if certain application requirements have been waived and information is already available.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The claimant's appeal for GIS eligibility based on estimated income was dismissed as she did not cease carrying on a business.

📜 Headnote Official document

The claimant appealed the decision regarding her Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) eligibility for July 2025 to June 2026 based on an estimate of her 2025 income. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the claimant did not cease carrying on a business despite reduced income.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

Citation: BP  v  [RESPONDENT] and [NAME] , 2026  SST  162 Social Security Tribunal of Canada General Division – Income Security Section Decision Appellant: [redacted] Respondent: [redacted] [RESPONDENT] and [NAME] reconsideration decision dated December 16, 2025 (issued by Service Canada) Tribunal member: [NAME] of hearing: In writing Decision date: March 6, 2026 File number: GP-25-1994 On this page Decision Overview Reasons for my decision Conclusion Decision [ 1 ] The appeal is dismissed. [ 2 ] The Appellant, [APPELLANT]., isn’t eligible to have her entitlement to the Guaranteed Income Supplement ( GIS ) for the payment period of July 2025 to June 2026 recalculated based on an estimate of her 2025 income. [ 3 ] This decision explains why I am dismissing the appeal. Overview How the GIS is calculated [ 4 ] The GIS is a monthly benefit for people who get an Old Age Security ( OAS ) pension. How much they get for the GIS (or whether they get it at all) depends on their income. [ 5 ] The payment periods for GIS go from July of one year to June of the following year. A person’s GIS entitlement for each payment period is based on their income in the previous calendar year. For example, their GIS entitlement for the July 2023 to June 2024 payment period is based on their 2022 income, as reported to the Canada Revenue Agency ( [NAME] ). The [NAME] gives the [RESPONDENT] and [NAME] (Minister) the person’s income information, which the Minister uses to calculate their GIS entitlement. Footnote 1 [ 6 ] In some cases, a person can file a Statement of Estimated Income (SEI) with the Minister. The Minister can, in certain circumstances, base the GIS calculation on the person’s estimated income for the current calendar year rather than their actual income from the previous calendar year. What happened in this case [ 7 ] The Appellant operated a business as a real estate agent. She turned 65 years old on March X, 2024. She started to receive an Old Age Security ( OAS ) pension in April 2024. [ 8 ] Based on her income in 2022, the Appellant was paid GIS from April 2024. [ 9 ] Based on her income in 2023, the Appellant was paid GIS for the payment period of July 2024 to June 2025. [ 10 ] The Appellant’s income was too high in 2024 to get GIS for the July 2025 to June 2026 payment period. She sent in an SEI for 2025 asking the Minister to use that as the basis to determine her eligibility for GIS payments from July 2025 to June 2026. The parties’ positions [ 11 ] The Minister says that the Appellant isn’t entitled to rely on her SEI for 2025 to calculate eligibility for GIS payments from July 2025 to June 2026 because she didn’t retire. Footnote 2 [ 12 ] The Appellant says she is entitled to rely on her SEI for 2025 because although she maintained her real estate licence and continued efforts to generate business, her commission income was nil. She says the Minister’s position that she had to retire is too restrictive, what matters is that her income was reduced. Reasons for my decision [ 13 ] The Appellant doesn’t dispute that she continued efforts to generate income. Footnote 3 The evidence shows that she did continue efforts to generate income. Footnote 4 In other words, she carried on a business. [ 14 ] The Appellant says: “Interpreting the provision as requiring complete and permanent withdrawal from self [RESPONDENT] imposes a condition not clearly stated in the statutory language and excludes self-employed individuals whose income has declined.” Footnote 5 [ 15 ] The law says that calculation of the GIS can be based on the person’s estimated income for the current calendar year if the applicant “ceases to carry on a business….” Footnote 6 [ 16 ] The law also says that calculation of the GIS can be based on the person’s estimated income for the current calendar year if the applicant experiences a termination or reduction in pension income. Footnote 7 This provision doesn’t apply to the Appellant’s situation. [ 17 ] The law clearly specifies the circumstances when a reduction of income in the current calendar year entitles the Minister to rely on an SEI for the current year. [ 18 ] Contrary to what the Appellant says, the language of the statute is clear. It does exclude people whose self-[RESPONDENT] income has been reduced unless the reason for the reduction is that they ceased carrying on a business. [ 19 ] I must follow the law. The law is clear. The Appellant didn’t cease carrying on a business. Conclusion [ 20 ] The Appellant isn’t eligible to have her entitlement to the GIS for the payment period of July 2025 to June 2026 recalculated based on an estimate of her 2025 income. [ 21 ] This means the appeal is dismissed. Footnotes Footnote 1 The Minister administers OAS and GIS for the Government of Canada through Service Canada. Return to footnote 1 referrer Footnote 2 See GD4. Return to footnote 2 referrer Footnote 3 See GD6. Return to footnote 3 referrer Footnote 4 See GD2-33 to GD2-35. Return to footnote 4 referrer Footnote 5 See GD6-1. Return to footnote 5 referrer Footnote 6 See section 14(2) of the Old Age Security Act . Return to footnote 6 referrer Footnote 7 See section 14(4) of the Old Age Security Act . Return to footnote 7 referrer

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The claimant must prove a severe and prolonged disability to qualify for benefits.
  • Continuing to carry on a business, even with declining income, disqualifies the claimant from having their GIS recalculated based on an estimate of current year's income.
  • An employer providing limited work hours and accommodations does not constitute regular employment capacity under CPP.
  • The claimant must file an appeal within one year of being informed of a reconsideration decision by the Minister of Employment and Social Development.
  • A person must prove continuous incapacity to qualify for earlier start date of CPP survivor’s pension payments.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The appeal was dismissed, and the claimant is not eligible for GIS based on an estimate of her current year's income.

Who was involved?

A person seeking Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) eligibility appealed a decision made by the Minister of Employment and Social Development.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal decided that the claimant must cease carrying on a business to be eligible for GIS based on an estimate of her current year's income.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 14(2) and 14(4) of the Old Age Security Act were cited in the decision.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The claimant argued that her reduced income should qualify for GIS eligibility, but the tribunal found this interpretation too broad.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone with reduced income from self-employment must cease carrying on their business to be eligible for GIS based on an estimate of current year's income.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence showing the claimant continued efforts to generate income was crucial in the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions from the Social Security Tribunal can typically be appealed to the Federal Court of Canada.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for such cases.

Official source: Social Security Tribunal of Canada (Old Age Security / GIS) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Social Security Tribunal of Canada (Old Age Security / GIS). It is a reproduction of an official work published by the Government of Canada, and the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of, the Government of Canada. It is not an official version.