Tax Appeal Struck: Importance of Clear Inventory Adjustments Explained
📌 In brief
A taxpayer's appeal was dismissed because they did not clearly state what inventory adjustments were needed or which tax years these adjustments should apply to. The court stressed the importance of providing specific details when filing an appeal.
⚖️ Legal holding
A taxpayer must clearly state what inventory adjustments they believe are entitled to make, the year(s) applicable, and the rationale behind it.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant's appeal was struck for failing to specify inventory adjustments and years in question.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tax Court struck the claimant's appeal for failing to specify inventory adjustments and years in question, emphasizing the need for clear articulation of legal arguments.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Struck Out
Docket: 2022-3149(IT)G BETWEEN: [APPELLANT] Appellant, and HIS [NAME] THE [NAME], Respondent . Motion determined by Written Submissions Before: The Honourable Justice David E. Graham Participants : For the Appellant: [redacted] Counsel for the Respondent: [redacted] THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The notice of appeal in respect of the Appellant’s 2007, 2008, 2011 and 2012 taxation years is struck. The notice of appeal in respect of the bifurcated portion of appeal of the reassessment of the Appellant’s 2010 taxation year relating to [NAME] is struck. On or before June 26, 2026, the Appellant shall file an Amended Notice of Appeal in respect of his 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years that clearly states the amount of inventory adjustments he says should be made, what year he says they should be made in and why he says they should be made. If the Appellant does not comply with paragraph 3, his appeals of his 2007, 2008, 2011 and 2012 tax years and the bifurcated [NAME] portion of his appeal of his 2010 tax year will automatically be dismissed without further hearing for want of prosecution and costs shall be awarded to the Respondent. If the Appellant files an Amended Notice of Appeal in compliance with the foregoing, the Respondent has leave to file an Amended Reply within 60 days thereof and will be entitled to any costs thrown away as a result of the Appellant’s change in issues. Signed this 22nd day of May 2026. “[NAME]. [NAME]” [NAME]. Citation: 2026 TCC 96 Date: 20260522 Docket: 2022-3149(IT)G BETWEEN: [APPELLANT], Appellant, and HIS [NAME] THE [NAME], Respondent.
REASONS FOR [APPELLANT]. [ 1 ] [APPELLANT] has appealed reassessments of his 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years. The reassessments of 2007, 2008, 2011 and 2012 involve the [NAME] donation program (“[NAME]”) . The reassessment of 2009 involves the [COMPANY]. The reassessment of 2010 involves both [NAME] and the [COMPANY]. That appeal has previously been bifurcated. [ 2 ] By order dated March 19, 2026, I gave eleven taxpayers who had participated in [NAME] the chance to explain why their appeals should not be struck without leave to amend for abusing this Court’s process. Mr. [APPELLANT] was one of those taxpayers. [ 3 ] Mr. [APPELLANT] took a different approach than the other taxpayers. He conceded that [NAME] did not work and that he was not entitled to the donations that he had claimed in respect of that program. [ 4 ] Instead, Mr. [APPELLANT] now argues that “[His] tax filer recalculated each tax year in question by removing the cash donations and the in-kind donations to [NAME]. As part of this process, each tax year was reviewed and adjusted utilizing acceptable accounting principles in accordance with [his] individual situation of being a farmer with an off-farm job. This means the principle of allowable inventory adjustments each year can/may be utilized and applicable.” [ 5 ] Mr. [APPELLANT] does not say what inventory adjustments he believes he is entitled to make or what year(s) he says they should be made in. The spreadsheet attached to his submissions is not helpful as it simply states what he thinks the outcome should be, not what adjustments he thinks should be made. [ 6 ] As it stands, Mr. [APPELLANT]’s Notice of Appeal says nothing about such adjustments. Instead, it focuses exclusively on his charitable donations. If Mr. [APPELLANT] wanted to change the basis of his appeal, he should have filed an Amended Notice of Appeal years ago. [ 7 ] Based on all of the foregoing, I am going to strike Mr. [APPELLANT]’s Notice of Appeal for his 2007, 2008, 2011 and 2012 tax years and the bifurcated [NAME] portion of his appeal of his 2010 tax year. I will, however, give him leave to file an Amended Notice of Appeal that clearly states what adjustments he says should be made, what year he says they should be made in and why he says they should be made. He will have until June 26, 2026 to do so. [ 8 ] If Mr. [APPELLANT] does not file an Amended Notice of Appeal in compliance with the foregoing, the appeals of his 2007, 2008, 2011 and 2012 tax years and the bifurcated [NAME] portion of his appeal of his 2010 tax year will be automatically dismissed without further hearing for want of prosecution with costs to the Respondent. [ 9 ] If Mr. [APPELLANT] files an Amended Notice of Appeal in compliance with the foregoing, the Respondent has leave to file an Amended Reply within 60 days and will be entitled to any costs thrown away as a result of Mr. [APPELLANT]’s late change in approach. Signed this 22nd day of May 2026. “[NAME]. [NAME]” Graham J. CITATION: 2026 TCC 96 COURT FILE NO.: 2022-3149(IT)G STYLE OF CAUSE: [APPELLANT] v. HIS [NAME] THE [NAME] OF HEARING: Motion determined by Written Submissions
REASONS FOR
ORDER BY: The Honourable Justice David E. Graham DATE OF
ORDER: May 22, 2026 PARTICIPANTS: For the Appellant: [redacted] Counsel for the Respondent: [redacted] COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: [redacted] n/a Firm: n/a For the Respondent: [redacted] Ottawa, Canada
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Tax Court of Canada Tax Court Strikes Donation Program Appeal
- Tax Court of Canada Tax Court Rejects GLGI Donation Appeal Due to Donative Intent Issue
- Tax Court of Canada Tax Court Rejects Appeal Due to Poorly Formatted Notice
- Tax Court of Canada Claimant’s Tax Appeal Struck Due to Lack of Donative Intent
- Tax Court of Canada Tax Appeal Dismissed: No Donative Intent Found
- Tax Court of Canada GLGI Donation Appeal Struck Down for Lack of Donative Intent
- Tax Court of Canada Taxpayer’s Appeal Struck Out Over Donation Program Participation
- Tax Court of Canada Tax Court Strikes Appeal Due to Abuse of Process
- Tax Court of Canada Tax Court Rejects FAPI Arguments in Appeals
- Tax Court of Canada Tax Appeal Struck Due to Mootness in Tax Court
- Tax Court of Canada Tax Court Strikes Portion of Donation Program Appeal
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The appellant did not present new facts or arguments that addressed previously identified legal issues.
- The taxpayer failed to clearly state the inventory adjustments they believed were entitled to make, including the year(s) applicable and rationale.
- The appeal involved stale arguments about donative intent in a tax donation program.
- The taxpayer's participation in a donation program was without genuine charitable intent.
- The appellant did not comply with strict procedural requirements such as Rule 99(2).
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The claimant's appeal was struck for lack of specificity regarding inventory adjustments and applicable tax years.
Who was involved?
A taxpayer (the claimant) against the Canada Revenue Agency (the respondent).
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to strike the appeal because the claimant failed to provide clear details about inventory adjustments and applicable tax years.
Which laws or rules were applied?
No specific laws were cited; however, the importance of providing detailed information in legal filings was emphasized.
What argument mattered most?
The lack of specificity regarding inventory adjustments and applicable tax years was crucial to the decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
Against the claimant, as their appeal was struck.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
It means that one must provide clear and detailed information when filing an appeal to avoid having it dismissed.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The court relied on the claimant's submissions, which lacked specific details about inventory adjustments.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, but typically such procedural decisions are difficult to overturn.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is highly recommended to consult with a qualified tax lawyer to ensure all legal filings meet the necessary standards.
