
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a social housing property in Croydon, considering comparables and landlord responsibilities under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The new rent was set at £288.46 per week.
A tenant challenged their landlord’s proposed rent increase but the First-tier Tribunal found the notice valid and set a new market rent at £700 per calendar month, effective from February 21, 2026. The decision was based on rental values in Leeds.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that an RTM (Right-to-Manage) company is entitled to receive uncommitted service charges from a previous managing entity. The decision was made due to the non-compliance of the previous manager with court directions and lack of evidence provided.
The First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord permission to carry out emergency repairs without consulting tenants because the work was urgent and necessary to prevent further damage from water leakage, ensuring that no tenant would be unfairly affected by this process.
The First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord permission to bypass certain consultation rules when carrying out urgent repairs due to water leaks and rodent infestations. No objections were raised by the affected residents, and there was no evidence of harm caused by not following the usual procedures.
The First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord permission to carry out urgent repairs to fire doors and leaking garage roofs without consulting tenants first, as required by law. This dispensation is conditional upon obtaining quotes from a person.
In a case involving an agreement for interim rights under the a person, the First-tier Tribunal ruled that no payment is required due to the minimal impact on the property and proper provision for administrative costs.
A landlord's appeal against a notice demanding payment for a person safety repairs was dismissed by the First-tier Tribunal because the appeal was submitted too late, despite arguments that the notice wasn't received on time. The decision emphasises strict adherence to legal deadlines.