Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £800 PCM
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a new rent of £800 per month for an assured tenancy based on market conditions. This decision was made after considering comparable rental values in the area and adjustments for improvements made by the tenant.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may propose and the tribunal determine a new rent based on market conditions if the existing rent is not the market rent.
📖 What the law says
This section allows landlords to propose an increase in rent for assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies, through a notice in a prescribed form. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, which begins at least two months after the notice is served. The section also outlines specific dates for rent increases, including considerations for yearly tenancies and shorter-term tenancies.
This section permits tenants under assured tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies, to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. It also allows tenants to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under section 13. The tribunal then determines the open-market rent, considering various factors including the periods of the tenancy and the terms of the agreement.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy under Section 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The tribunal considered comparable rental values in the area, adjustments for improvements made by the tenant, and found no undue hardship.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference BIR/OOCN/MNR/2025/0810
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
[COUNSEL]
Tenant’s Representative
None
Landlord
Mrs [COUNSEL]
Landlord’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord’s Representative
Mr [COUNSEL] of Application 30 September 2025
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members [NAME] – [NAME] of Decision
11 February 2026
Rent Determined
£800.00 per calendar month Date the new rent takes effect 16 October 2025
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £800 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £750 pcm to take effect from 16 October 2025.
2. On 30 September 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The assured tenancy commenced on 16 July 1990. The rental period is monthly.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Liability for Council Tax
5. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property.
6. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Inspection/Hearing
7. Neither party requested an inspection or a hearing.
8. The Tribunal considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
The Property
9. The Property is a semi-detached house and provides the following accommodation:
Internal: Living room, kitchen/ diner, bathroom, three bedrooms.
Outside: Garden and outbuildings.
The Property benefits from central heating and double glazing. The Landlord confirmed the Tenant had erected the garage and the Tenant advised it had deteriorated and was no longer accessible.
3
The Tenant has provided all the carpets and curtains and white goods. The Tenant also stated that she replaced the washing machine, microwave and dining room carpet.
Evidence
10. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.
The Tenant
11. The Tenant submitted a form detailing the accommodation and alterations carried out.
12. No other details, comparable evidence or information was included.
The Landlord
13. The Landlord similarly submitted details of the accommodation and referred to some alterations carried out by the Tenant.
Determination and Valuation
14. In the absence of any comparable evidence from the parties, the Tribunal had regard to its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area.
15. The Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £800pcm.
16. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as other properties that are offered to let in the market.
17. The Tribunal found that no adjustments were necessary for the condition of the Property but made an adjustments for the carpets and curtains and white goods and some of the improvements provided by the Tenant compared to the evidence.
18. The Tribunals full valuation is shown below:
Starting Rent
£850.00pcm
Less Adjustments for condition and improvements £50.00
Market rent
£800.00 pcm
4
Undue hardship
12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.
13. No application was made by the Tenant in this respect.
14. As a result of our decision the rent will increase by £50 per month. The date specified in the landlord’s notice was 16 October 2025 and accordingly sets the starting date for the new rent as at this date.
Decision
15. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £800 per calendar month with effect from 16 October 2025.
APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £750 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Manchester Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent After Tenant Appeal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent After Tenant Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market value.
- The rent should be adjusted based on the condition of the property.
- Environmental factors affecting desirability must be considered.
- Reliable comparables and evidence of property condition support a new market rent.
- A determination of a market rent under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 is required.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set a new rent of £800 pcm for an assured tenancy.
Who was involved?
A landlord proposed a rent increase, and a tenant contested it in the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal reviewed comparable rental values and adjustments for improvements made by the tenant to determine the market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tribunal considered comparable rental values in the area and adjustments for improvements made by the tenant.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was against the tenant, as the rent increased to £800 pcm.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone contesting a rent increase should gather comparable rental values and evidence of any improvements made to their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence on comparable rental values, the condition of the property, and any improvements made by the tenant were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) based on points of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
