VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Property Condition and Tenant Improvements

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the fair rent for a property in Rugby, taking into account the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant. The new fair rent is £133.00 per week, effective from 19 February 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant.

Topics

fair rentproperty conditiontenant improvements

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the fair rent after considering the property's condition and the tenant's improvements.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the fair rent for a property located in Rugby, considering the property's condition and improvements made by the tenant. The decision was made on 19 February 2025, setting the fair rent at £133.00 per week.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: BIR/44UD/F77/2024/0637

Property : 58 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: A [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 18 November 2024

Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977

Tribunal Members : V Ward BSc Hons FRICS Regional Surveyor

Judge David R Salter

Date of Decision : 19 February 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £133.00 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 19 February 2025 being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. The Rent Officer registered a rental of £133.00 per week on 11 November 2024, effective from the same date. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.

Evidence

3. No written submissions were provided by the Landlord in response to the Tribunal’s directions. The Tenant provided photographs to the Tribunal which showed scaffolding erected at the Property and the front door but with no accompanying written statement. The Tenant had made submissions to the Rent Officer that they had suffered roof leaks and wall repairs at the Property for over three years that were still ongoing.

Determination and Valuation

4. On consideration of the evidence provided by the parties, forwarded by the Rent Officer, and the Tribunal’s own expert knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the Property in a satisfactory condition would be in the region of £265.00 per week. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:

a) Condition. There appears to have been ongoing problems with the roof for a significant period. b) Curtains, carpets and white goods fitted by the Tenant. c) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity using their own general knowledge and experience. The Tribunal considers that in the wider geographical area there is an imbalance of supply and demand impacting on rental values and has, therefore, has made a deduction of 15% for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

Per week

3

Market Rent

£265.00

Less a) Items given under a) above

£60.00

b) Items given under b) above

£35.00 c) Tenant’s internal decoration liability @ 5% £13.25 £108.25

£156.75 Less Scarcity @ 15%

£23.51

£133.24

Say

£133.00

Decision

7. Therefore, the Tribunal confirms the Fair Rent registered by the Rent Officer of £133.00 per week with effect from 19 February 2025.

8. The maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is £159.50 per week. This therefore has no impact on the rent determined by the Tribunal. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

Chairman: V Ward

Date:

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

4 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

BIR/44UD/F77/2024/0637

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were: 58 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

V Ward BSc Hons FRICS Judge DR Salter

Landlord [NAME]

[NAME]

1. The fair rent is £133.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 19 February 2025

3. The amount for services is - Per -

/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

- Per -

/ not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £159.50 per week permitted by the Order.

Chairman V Ward Date of decision 19 February 2025

5 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 392.1

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 317.7

X 392.1 Minus Y 317.7 = (A) 74.4

(A) 74.4 Divided by Y 317.7 = (B) 0.234183192

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.284183192

Last registered rent* £124.00 Multiplied by (C) = £159.24 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £159.50

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £159.50 Per week Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant made improvements to the property.
  • The property's condition was taken into account.
  • Rent adjustments were based on market value and specific conditions.
  • Rent adjustments were determined by the Tribunal considering relevant factors.
  • Improvements made by the tenant led to a fair rent adjustment.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal decided to adjust the fair rent for a property in Rugby to £133.00 per week.

Who was involved?

The tenant objected to the initial determination of the fair rent by the Rent Officer, leading to a hearing at the First-tier Tribunal.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and the improvements made by the tenant, adjusting the fair rent accordingly.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and any improvements they've made when disputing a fair rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs showing the condition of the property and the tenant's improvements were considered important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.