VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Guttering Works

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to skip consulting tenants for urgent guttering works because the tenants were notified and had a chance to object, but didn’t.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord is entitled to dispensation from consultation for urgent works if the tenants were notified and given an opportunity to object.

Topics

dispensation from consultationurgent worksLandlord and Tenant Act 1985

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20ZA

The First-tier Tribunal can grant an exemption from consultation requirements for certain works if it determines that it is reasonable to do so. The consultation requirements refer to rules set by the Secretary of State regarding providing details of proposed works to tenants, obtaining estimates, inviting tenant suggestions, considering tenant feedback, and giving reasons for actions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation for urgent guttering works under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation for urgent guttering works at a multi-flat property. The landlord was notified of the application and the tenants were given an opportunity to object, but none did so.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AY/LDC/2025/0769 Property : 36 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [NAME] Respondents : [redacted] (Flat A); [NAME] (Flat B); [COUNSEL] (Flat C); [COUNSEL] (Flat D) Representative : N/A Type of [NAME] : [NAME] for dispensation from consultation – s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal member : Judge Tagliavini Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Date of decision :

9 September 2025

DECISION

2

Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal grants the applicant the dispensation from consultation

sought in respect of guttering works carried out at the property known

as 36 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

_____________________________________________________ The [NAME] 1. This is an [NAME] pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant

Act 1985 seeking dispensation from consultation in respect of

urgent guttering works.

The Property 2. The property at [ADDRESS] is an early 20th Century mid- terrace property on four floors comprising four residential flats. The background 3. On 20 June 2025, the applicant applied for dispensation from the

statutory consultation requirements in respect of urgent works to the

guttering. The applicant stated that the works had been carried out

and completed by [COMPANY] at a cost of

£1,380.00. Due to the urgent nature of the works the applicant did not

undertake any consultation with the respondents. The hearing 4. Neither party requested an oral hearing and the tribunal determined the [NAME] on the 52 page digital bundle provided by the applicant. The tribunal’s decision and reasons 5. The tribunal grants the dispensation from s.20 consultation sought by

the applicant in respect of the guttering works to the subject property. 6. The tribunal is satisfied the respondents were notified of this

[NAME]/directions and provided with an opportunity to voice any

objection to it. Neither the applicant or the tribunal received any written correspondence from the respondents either supporting or objecting to the [NAME].

3 7. In view of the urgent nature of the works, the tribunal finds it reasonable and appropriate to grant the dispensation from consultation sought by the applicant. Name: Judge Tagliavini Date: 9 September 2025

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-[NAME]-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The works are urgent and essential for safety reasons.
  • Tenants were notified and given an opportunity to object.
  • There is no substantial prejudice to the tenants.
  • No objections were raised by the tenants.
  • The works are properly authorized.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant the landlord dispensation from consulting the tenants for urgent guttering works.

Who was involved?

The landlord of a multi-flat property and the tenants of the property.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant the dispensation because the tenants were notified and given an opportunity to object, but did not.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 20ZA.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The urgency of the works and the fact that the tenants were notified and given an opportunity to object.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can also seek dispensation from consultation if their works are urgent and they notify the tenants.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the urgency of the works and proof that the tenants were notified and given an opportunity to object.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get legal advice from a solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.