First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Roof Repair Dispensation

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AH/LDC/2022/0015 P: PAPERREMOTE Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : The [COMPANY] Respondents : [redacted] schedule to the [NAME] : Unrepresented Type of [NAME] : Section 20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Dispensation with consultation requirements Tribunal member(s) : Judge Donegan Date of Paper Determination : 06 April 2022 Date of Decision : 06 April 2022

DECISION

This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has not been objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, and all issues could be determined on paper. The documents that I was referred to are in a bundle of 33 pages, the contents of which I have noted.

2 Decision of the Tribunal

(a) The Tribunal grants prospective dispensation under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) for the proposed replacement of the flat roof above Flats 11 and 12 at [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (‘the Property’). (b) No terms are imposed on the grant of dispensation. (c) The applicant shall send a copy of this decision to each of the respondents, either by email, hand delivery or first-class post. It shall also send a copy to any recognised residents association and display a copy in a prominent place in the common parts of the Property. It must send an email to the Tribunal by 20 April 2022, confirming the date(s) when this was done. The [NAME]

1. The applicant seeks dispensation from the consultation requirements imposed by section 20 of the 1985 Act.

2. The [NAME] is dated 19 January 2022 and directions were issued on 22 February 2022. The case was allocated to the paper track, to be determined upon the basis of written representations. None of the parties has objected to this allocation or requested an oral hearing. The paper determination took place on 06 April 2022.

3. The relevant legal provisions are set out in the appendix to this decision. The background 4. The Property is a residential block containing 24 flats. The [COMPANY] is the freeholder. The respondents are the leaseholders of the 24 flats and are all members of this company. The Property is managed by [COMPANY] (‘TPRL’).

5. Flat 12 is suffering water ingress in the bathroom and hallway, caused by leaks from the flat roof above. There have been numerous repairs to this roof over several years, and it now requires complete replacement. TPRL have obtained a quotation from [NAME] (‘PGR’) dated 13 January 2022 for £9,689 (excluding any VAT).

6. The applicant seeks dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the replacement of the flat roof above Flats 11 and 12.

3 7. The only issue for the Tribunal is whether it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements. This [NAME] does not concern the issue of whether any service charge costs will be reasonable or payable. The grounds of the [NAME]

8. The grounds are contained in the tribunal [NAME]. A copy of PGR’s quote was included in the determination bundle.

9. In brief the applicant contends the roof replacement is urgent, due to the leaks into Flat 12 which inconvenience the residents. TPRL has obtained a quote from a competent and reputable roofing contractor.

10. Paragraph 2 of the directions gave the respondents an opportunity to object to the dispensation [NAME] by completing and returning reply forms and serving statements, setting out their grounds of opposition. No objections have been received by the tribunal. The Tribunal’s decision 11. The Tribunal grants prospective dispensation for the replacement of the flat roof, as detailed in PGR’s quote dated 13 January 2022. No terms are imposed on the grant of dispensation. Reasons for the tribunal’s decision 12. The Tribunal accepts the roof replacement is urgent, given the ongoing leaks into Flat 12. A full section 20 consultation would take three months or more and considerably delay this work. TPRL acted reasonably in obtaining a quote from PGR and then applying for dispensation.

13. None of the respondents have contested this [NAME] or identified any prejudice that might arise from the grant of dispensation or proposed any terms as a condition of granting dispensation.

14. The respondents are all members of the [COMPANY] and presumably have a say in the management of the Property.

15. Having regard to the particular facts of this case and the guidance in [COMPANY] v Benson [2013] UKSC 14, it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements.

16. This decision does not address the cost of the roof replacement or whether the respondents are liable to contribute to this cost via their service charges. Nothing in this decision prevents the respondents

4 from seeking a determination of ‘payability’, pursuant to section 27A of the 1985 Act. Name: Judge Donegan Date: 06 April 2022

Rights of appeal

1. By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.

2. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.

3. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

4. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

5. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.

6. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

5 Appendix of relevant legislation

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (as amended) Section 20 (1) Where this section applies to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the relevant contributions of tenants are [COMPANY] in accordance with subsection (6) or (7) (or both) unless the consultation requirements have been either— (a) complied with in relation to the works or agreement, or (b) dispensed with in relation to the works or agreement by (or on appeal from) the appropriate tribunal . (2) In this section “relevant contribution”, in relation to a tenant and any works or agreement, is the amount which he may be required under the terms of his lease to contribute (by the payment of service charges) to relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement. (3) This section applies to qualifying works if relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works exceed an appropriate amount. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that this section applies to a qualifying long term agreement— (a) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement exceed an appropriate amount, or (b) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement during a period prescribed by the regulations exceed an appropriate amount. (5) An appropriate amount is an amount set by regulations made by the Secretary of State; and the regulations may make provision for either or both of the following to be an appropriate amount— (a) an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations, and (b) an amount which results in the relevant contribution of any one or more tenants being an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations. (6) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (a) of subsection (5), the amount of the relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement which may be taken into account in determining the relevant contributions of tenants is [COMPANY] to the appropriate amount. (7) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (b) of that subsection, the amount of the relevant contribution of the tenant, or each of the tenants, whose relevant contribution would otherwise exceed the amount prescribed by, or determined in

6 accordance with, the regulations is [COMPANY] to the amount so prescribed or determined.] Section 20ZA (1) Where an [NAME] is made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination to dispense with all of any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements. (2) In section 20 and this section –

“qualifying works” means works on a building or any other premises, and

“qualifying long term agreement” means (subject to subsection (3)) an agreement entered into, by or on behalf of the landlord or a [NAME], for a term of more than twelve months.

Section 27A (1) An [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether a service charge is payable and, if it is, as to - (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable, (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) An [NAME] may also be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether, if costs were incurred for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance or management of any specified description, a service charge would be payable for the costs and, if it would, as to - (a) the person by whom it would be payable, (b) the person to whom it would be payable, (c) the amount which would be payable, (d) the date at or by which it would be payable, and (e) the manner in which it would be payable. (4) No [NAME] under subsection (1) or (3) may be made in respect of a matter which - (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or

7 (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment.