VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the fair a person for a property, setting it at £960 per month. They took into account the property's condition and its value in the current market.

⚖️ Legal holding

The capped fair rent under the Rent Act 1977 is calculated based on the retail price index (RPI) changes and additional percentages as specified in the Act.

Topics

fair rent determinationproperty valuationrent regulation

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £960 per calendar month, which was capped at £1,149 per calendar month under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the fair rent for a property at £960 per calendar month, excluding certain charges, after considering the property's condition and market value. The decision was made under the Rent Act 1977 and adheres to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00AN/F77/2024/0089

Notice of the Tribunal [NAME] 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 174 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Judge Rosanna Foskett Mrs [NAME] MA MRICS

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The fair [NAME] is £960 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 29 April 2024

3. The amount for services is N/A Per

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for [NAME] allowance is

N/A Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The [NAME] is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than [NAME]) where different from [NAME] entry

8. For information only:

The fair [NAME] to be registered is not limited by the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair [NAME] of £1,149 per calendar month prescribed by the Order.

Chairman Judge Rosanna Foskett Mrs [NAME] MA MRICS Date of decision 29 April 2024

FR27 [NAME] LATEST RPI FIGURE X 383

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 314.3

X 383 Minus Y 314.3 = (A) 68.7

(A) 68.7 Divided by Y 314.3 = (B) 0.218581

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.268581

Last registered [NAME]* 905.67 Multiplied by (C) = 1148.92 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1149

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

[NAME] = £1149 Per Cal month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair [NAME], in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair [NAME] to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered [NAME] by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair [NAME] determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the [NAME] is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the [NAME] 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair [NAME].

FR27

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. The previous fair [NAME] for this property registered with effect from 15 January 2022 was £905.67 per calendar month.

2. Following an application by the Landlord on 26 October 2023, with effect from 15 January 2024, the [NAME] registered the fair [NAME] at £936 per calendar month.

3. Following an objection dated 17 January 2024 made by the Landlord to the determination by the [NAME], the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the [NAME] 1977.

Inspection 4. No party requested an inspection by the Tribunal.

Evidence 5. The Tribunal considered the documents that had been sent by the Valuation Office Agency, the Landlord and the Tenant. There was no oral hearing.

Determination and Valuation 6. The property is a self-contained flat within a converted Victorian terraced house. The accommodation comprises 2 rooms, 1 kitchen, 1 bathroom/WC and a garden. There is no central heating. No photographs or other descriptions of the condition of the property were provided, apart from the [NAME]’s notes on the adjustments made to the open market [NAME], which noted that the Tenant was liable for decoration, the Landlord provided no floor coverings, curtains or white goods and the kitchen is unmodernised. There may have been certain other notes made in relation to the adjustments but the Tribunal was unable to see them on the screenshot submitted showing the [NAME]’s calculations.

7. Having regard to our own [NAME], general knowledge of rental values in the area (including based on comparable figures for properties in the area which have actually been let), we consider that the open market [NAME] for the property would be around £2,000 per calendar month.

8. This hypothetical [NAME] is adjusted as necessary to allow for the differences between the terms and conditions considered usual for such a letting in today’s market and the condition of the actual property at the date of the determination under the [NAME] 1977. Any benefit derived from the tenant’s improvements (if any) is disregarded.

9. The Tribunal made adjustments amounting to 40% of the open market [NAME] in line with the [NAME]’s notes on the condition of the property.

10. That gave a fair [NAME] of £1,200 per calendar month.

11. A further deduction for scarcity of 20% was then made giving an uncapped fair [NAME] for the purposes of section 70 of the 1977 Act of £960 per calendar month.

FR27

Decision 12. The capped [NAME] for the property according to the provisions of the [NAME] ([NAME]) Order 1999 is calculated at £1,149 per calendar month (see calculation above). 13. In this case, the lower [NAME] of £960 per calendar month is to be registered as the fair [NAME] for this property.

Chairman: Judge Rosanna Foskett, Mrs [NAME] MA MRICS

Date: 29 April 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was determined to be £960 per calendar month.
  • The effective date for the new fair rent was set as 29 April 2024.
  • The property's open market rent was estimated at £2,000 per month based on the Tribunal's knowledge and comparable properties.
  • A 40% adjustment was applied to the open market rent due to the property's condition, including the unmodernised kitchen.
  • A further 20% deduction was made for scarcity, resulting in an uncapped fair rent of £960 per month.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for the property was set at £960 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and its market value to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the property's condition and its market value.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined based on the property's condition and market value.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Documents from the Valuation Office Agency, the landlord, and the tenant were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate legal channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.