VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition and compared it to similar properties in the area. The rent was set at £1,880.00 per month, starting from February 20th, 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination reflecting the property's condition and market comparables.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination takes into account the property's condition and local market comparables.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and local market comparables. The rent was set at £1,880.00 per calendar month, effective from 20th February 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00BG/MNR/2024/0070

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 41 [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

Judge Tueje Mrs A Flynn MRICS

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 124 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1880.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20th February 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 20th December 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises Purpose-built third floor flat comprising two bedrooms, reception, kitchen, bathroom (without toilet) and separate toilet

Chairman Judge Tueje Date of Decision 9th July 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference

: LON/0BG/MNR/2024/0070 Property :

41 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant : (1) [COUNSEL] (2) [COUNSEL] [NAME] : In person Landlord : [COUNSEL] [NAME] : [RESPONDENT] (agent) Tribunal members : Judge Tueje Mrs A Flynn MRICS Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of hearing : 7th June 2024 Date of decision : 9th July 2024

DETERMINATION

The Tribunal’s determination Decision

The Tribunal determines that the market rent for the subject property is £1,880.00 per calendar month, with effect from 20th February 2024.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2014

2 Background

1. By a notice from the landlord’s agent dated 10th January 2024, the landlord sought an increase in rent under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988. The landlord proposed that the rent should increase from £1,858.00 to £2,100 per calendar month, with effect from 20th February 2024.

2. By an [NAME] received on 13th February 2023, the Applicants sought a determination of the rent payable under their tenancy.

3. The Tribunal’s jurisdiction is to set a market rent for the property taking into consideration the terms of the tenancy, the condition of the property, its location and the market rent for similar properties in the locality.

4. The tenants occupied the property under the terms of a 12-month fixed term tenancy agreement commencing 20th December 2022, which has since expired. They now occupy the property as statutory periodic tenants.

The inspection

5. The Tribunal inspected the property on 7th June 2024. We found it to be situated within a purpose-built block. The property itself is on the third floor of the block and comprises two bedrooms, a kitchen, living room, a bathroom without a toilet, and a separate toilet.

6. The Tribunal noted from its internal inspection that the bathroom and toilet are unmodernised, the kitchen is dated and has surface pipes and trunking. The kitchen’s white goods and curtains within the property belong to the tenant.

The law and the Tribunal’s valuation

7. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 (“the 1988 Act”) make provision for the increase of rent under an assured periodic tenancy.

8. Under section 14 of the 1988 Act, the Tribunal must determine the rent that would be obtained in respect of the same property on a new letting on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, on otherwise similar terms (other than rent) to the existing tenancy. The rent so determined must, however, disregard the effect on the rent of the granting of the tenancy to a sitting tenant; any increase in the value of the property as a result of improvements carried out by the tenant during the tenancy (or a previous tenancy), otherwise than as a result of his or her obligations to the landlord under the lease; or any reduction attributable to a failure to comply with such an obligation.

3 9. In coming to its decision, the Tribunal considered its observations of the property at the inspection.

10. The Tribunal first assessed the market price that would be achieved for a new letting in a condition that would be expected of the property if it were to be marketed now. The Tribunal considered comparable properties, namely two bedroom flats. Based on reasonably comparable properties, these show £2,350.00 to be the starting point.

11. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that, if the property were in the condition to be expected of a current market letting, that the rent would be in the region of £2,350.00.

12. However, the property must be valued on the basis that a tenant would seek a reduction from that asking rent to reflect the unmodernised condition of the property. The reduction is not measured in monetary value, but reflects the percentage reduction that would be needed to let the property as it is today.

13. Based on the Tribunal’s knowledge and experience, we conclude a tenant would seek a reduction of at least 20% of the market value to take account of all of these matters.

Conclusion

14. The Tribunal determines the market rent for the subject property, taking into account paragraphs 5 to 13 above, is £1,880.00 per calendar month. The Tribunal’s decision takes effect from 20th February 2024, being the date in the notice proposing a new rent.

Name:

Judge Tueje

Date: 9th July 2024

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such

4 reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's condition is considered in determining the rent.
  • Market comparables are used to determine the fair rent.
  • Rent determination reflects both the property's condition and market value.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy at £1,880.00 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local market comparables.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect the rent to be set based on the property's condition and local market comparables.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the condition of the property and comparisons to similar properties.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.