First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition and market value, setting the rent at £1,650.00 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value of the property, considering its condition and inventory.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination excludes certain factors such as the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant, improvements made by the tenant, and reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and property condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and property condition, excluding personal circumstances of the tenant or landlord. The rent was set at £1,650.00 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/45UF/MNR/2022/0087
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr R [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1550.00 Plus £100.00 for oil Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 23 August 2022
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 23 July 2018
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets, curtains and white goods.
8. Description of premises 3 bedroom flat in a converted Grade II listed building, originally converted in 1960.
Note: Additional charge for oil supplied £100.00 pcm.
Chairman Mr R [NAME] of Decision 8 September 2022
1
Case Reference
: CHI/45UF/MNR/2022/0087
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
Date of Application : Received 27th July 2022
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 8th September 2022
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 8th September 2022 that the rent will be£1,550.00 plus £100.00 for oil (£1,650.00) per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 23rd August 2022.
2. By an application received on 27th July 2022, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 11th July 2022 proposed a rent of £1,550.00 plus £100.00 for oil (£1,650.00) pcm with effect from 23rd August 2022, in place of the current rent of £1,350.00 plus £100.00 for oil (£1,450.00) pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and commenced on 23rd July 2018. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 5th August 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in 13 acres of its own garden and located between Horsham and Southwater.
8. The property comprises a centrally heated, single glazed, second floor flat in a Grade II listed building.
9. The accommodation, set over 2 floors, comprises: Living/dining room, study, kitchen, bathroom, W.C and 3 bedrooms. Outside: Communal gardens and garage.
10. The property is let unfurnished with floor coverings, curtains, cooker, fridge and washing machine.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services (except gas) are connected.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 12. Tribunal Directions.
13. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.
14. [APPELLANT]: Application Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement and Building Surveyor’s report.
Landlord's Representations (summarised):
3
15. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and attachments:
a) The Landlord pays the service charge to [RESPONDENT]. The amount in respect of the oil is £266.00 pcm more than the [APPELLANT] is currently contributing. b) Overall the property is in good repair. There are signs of wear and tear. Various rooms have been redecorated since the property was first let in 2007. c) The kitchen and bathroom fittings were installed in 2007 and are in good condition in relation to their age. d) Conversion into flats took place in 1960. 12 flats in total set in 13 acres of communal gardens. e) Christ’s Hospital and Horsham train station is within 2 miles. Access to London in about 1 hour. Bus stop into Horsham at bottom of the drive. f) The damp mould in bedroom 2 referred to by the [APPELLANT] has been repaired by the Management company. During the period of disrepair a rent allowance was mode. g) As to the [APPELLANT]’s reference to flies, the windows are old Crittal type single glazed and it is not unusual for flies and ladybirds to shelter in these frames.
16. As to rental value the Landlord says the original tenancy agreement commenced in July 2018 and the rent of £1,350.00 plus £100.00 for oil there has been not been increased since commencement.
17. Comparable evidence: Flat 10: Comparable but smaller flat (1269 sq ft) 3 bedrooms (and study) let in April 2021 £1550.00 pcm (excluding oil). [NAME] estimate current rent £1,850.00pcm. Flat 9: (1,600 sq ft) [NAME] estimate current rent £1,990.00 pcm. Both flats are let on similar unfurnished terms.
[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised)
18. The [APPELLANT] says in the Application and Reply Forms:
a) Photographs of damp mould and old critall type window frame. b) Roof renovation was completed in June 2022. A rent reduction was in place until repairs completed. c) The property is overall in good condition other than damage by long term damp penetration. d) There is still a fly infestation in Bedroom 2. e) As to the proposed rent the [APPELLANT] is willing to pay £1,450.00 (including oil) pcm.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 19. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
20. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord
4
under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.
21. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at F expiring 9th August 2032. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
22. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
23. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £1,550.00 plus £100.00 plus oil (£1,650.00) pcm.
24. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make no deductions for issues identified.
25. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £1,550.00 plus £100.00 plus oil (£1,650.00) pcm.
26. The rent will take effect from 23rd August 2022 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 27. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
28. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
5
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £3200 Per Month Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £295.05 Weekly
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value of the property.
- The rent determination takes into account the property's condition.
- The rent determination considers the property's inventory or amenities.
- The tribunal sets the rent based on current market conditions.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant losing factors identified in the provided cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1,650.00 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market value, ensuring the rent reflects what a willing landlord might expect to receive.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and market value of the property were crucial arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was set according to the market value and condition of the property.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect the rent to be set based on the property's condition and market value.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence on the property's condition, comparable rents, and market conditions were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law only.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
