Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition and amenities to set the rent at £895.00 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value of the property, considering its condition and amenities.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market, considering the type of tenancy and the condition of the property.
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the lessor to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes, as well as installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation. The lessor also has a duty to maintain installations for space heating and heating water. However, the lessor is not required to carry out repairs if they do not affect the lessee's enjoyment of the dwelling house or common parts.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and property condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value of the property, considering its condition and amenities. The rent was set at £895.00 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00MW/MNR/2021/0130
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [NAME]
[RESPONDENT] [NAME] [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 895.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 04 November 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 04 December 2017
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT], dishwasher, cooker, fridge freezer.
8. Description of premises 2 bedroom house with central heating and double glazing.
[NAME] of Decision 4 January 2022
1
Case Reference
: CHI/00MW//MNR/2021/0130
Property : [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Isle of Wight [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
[COMPANY].
Respondent: [redacted] : 2nd November 2021
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 4th January 2022
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 4th January 2022 in the sum of £895.00 per calendar month (pcm).
2. By an application dated 2nd November 2021, the tenant of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 30th September 2021 proposed a rent of £895.00 pcm with effect from 4th November 2021, in place of the current rent of £750.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 15th November 2017. The tenancy is subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and Tenant Act 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 17th November 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in a residential area.
8. The property comprises a late 1970s centrally heated, double glazed detached house.
9. The accommodation comprises: Ground Floor: 1 reception room, kitchen/diner and w.c. First Floor: 2 bedrooms and bathroom. Outside: garden and allocated off street parking.
10. The property is let unfurnished but with washing machine, dishwasher, cooker, fridge freezer and carpets.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.
Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 17th November 2021.
14. [RESPONDENT]: Tribunal Reply Form.
15. Tenant: Application and Reply Forms, Letter from [APPELLANT], Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement.
3
[RESPONDENT]'s Representations (summarised): 16. The [RESPONDENT] says in the Reply Form and attachments:
a) In 2014/2015 [RESPONDENT] undertook a refurbishment of the property including new roof covering, dormers, fitted kitchen, new bathroom, re-plastering and floor coverings.
b) The property is in an ideal location, walking distance of Ryde centre and beach.
c) A rent higher than the proposed £895.00 could now be achieved.
e) Attached are photographs of the subject property.
Tenant's Representations (summarised) 17. In the Application Form the Tenant' representative confirmed the details of the accommodation.
18. In relation to repairs the [RESPONDENT] has not completed repairs and there are outstanding matters relating to the gas boiler and water leaks.
19. Isle of Wight Council issued a schedule of outstanding matters on 27th October 2021: a) Disrepair to shower b) Evidence of water leak to bath and all sinks. c) No mechanical extraction in Bathroom. c) Only one handrail to staircase. d) Electric consumer unit non compliant with current regulations.
20. In relation to the proposed increase the Tenant accepts an increase is due but states that in neighbouring properties in [ADDRESS], owned by the same [RESPONDENT], there have been increases increases of between £25.00 and £50.00 pcm.
21. Properties offering similar accommodation are available at rents ranging from £625.00 to £825.00 pcm. A property in Winston is considered closest in size at £775.00 pcm.
22. The [RESPONDENT] is responsible for keeping in repair the structure and exterior of the property (including drains, gutters and external pipes) and to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the property for the supply of water, sewage, gas, electricity and for sanitation (including basins, sinks, baths and sanitary conveniences) and the installations at the property for space heating and heating water which we believe would be the same for the current rentals.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 23. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
4
24. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant or [RESPONDENT] are not relevant to this issue.
25. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at C expiring on 19th December 2031. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
26. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
27. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the [RESPONDENT] could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating above F would be £895.00 pcm.
28. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property (as shown in the [RESPONDENT]'s photographs) determined to make no deduction in respect of those works identified by the Tenant.
29. Accordingly the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £895.00 pcm.
30. The rent will take effect from 4th November 2021 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 31. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
32. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
5
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Increase Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £3200 Per Month Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value of the property, adjusted for its condition.
- The tenant can challenge a landlord's proposed rent increase under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and inventory.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the current market conditions and the actual condition of the property.
- A landlord cannot unreasonably increase rent without considering the property's condition and market comparables.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A tenant is entitled to a rent increase if it reflects the current market conditions and the property's condition, but the case was dismissed.
- A landlord is entitled to increase the rent of an assured periodic tenancy if the proposed rent reflects the current market value, but the case was dismissed.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £895.00 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, considering its condition and amenities.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and amenities of the property were the most important factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the market value and condition of their property when determining rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and a schedule of outstanding matters were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
