VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £995.00 per month. They took into account the current market conditions and the condition of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the current market conditions and the actual condition of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancymarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, taking into account the current market conditions and the condition of the property.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the lessor to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes, as well as installations for the supply of water, gas, electricity, and sanitation. Additionally, the lessor must also keep in repair and proper working order the installations for space heating and heating water. However, the lessor is not required to carry out repairs unless they affect the lessee's enjoyment of the dwelling-house or any common parts to which the lessee is entitled to use.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the appropriate rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the condition of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy to be £995.00 per calendar month, effective from 6th February 2022, considering market conditions and the condition of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HB/MNR/2022/0008

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 266 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [NAME]

[RESPONDENT] [NAME] 270 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 995.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 06 February 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 06 April 2016

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT], curtains and white goods ([APPELLANT] replaced by Tenant).

8. Description of premises Double glazed centrally heated semi-detached house with 2 bedrooms.

Chairman Mr R [NAME] of Decision 16 March 2022

1

Case Reference

: CHI/00HB/MNR/2022/0008

Property : [ADDRESS], Westbury - on -Trym, Bristol [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : 30th January 2022

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]

: 16th March 2022

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 16th March 2022 will be £995.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 6th February 2022.

2. By an application dated 30th January 2022, the Tenant of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 5th January 2022 proposed a rent of £1,095.00 pcm with effect from 6th February 2022, in place of the current rent of £850.00 pcm.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 6th April 2016. The tenancy is subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and Tenant Act 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 11th February 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in a mainly residential area to the north of Bristol City Centre, close to Southmead Hospital and other amenities are readily available.

8. The property comprises a double-glazed centrally heated semi-detached house with rendered masonry under a tiled roof.

9. The accommodation comprises: Ground Floor: Hall, Living Room, Dining Room, kitchen, bathroom/WC. First Floor: W.C and 2 bedrooms. Outside: Garden and off-street parking.

10. The property is let unfurnished but with carpets ,curtains and white goods.

11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.

Hearing and Applications for Order 1 by both parties 12. A hearing was not requested.

13. On 13th March 2022 the Tenant submitted an application under Order 1 asking the Tribunal to decline the [RESPONDENT]’s proposed increase, essentially because of the ongoing repair issues.

14. On 14th March the [RESPONDENT] submitted an application under Order 1 asking the Tribunal to note the Tenant had agreed to the increase and saying that the Tenant

3

was referring to resolved issues. Further that historic photographs were not relevant to the market rent today.

15. On the 14th March 2022 the Tenant submitted a 2nd application under Order 1 again asking the Tribunal to decline the [RESPONDENT]’s requested increase acknowledging that she had said she would accept an increase if repairs were carried out.

Tribunal’s consideration and determination on the Order 1 applications.

16. The applications contain references to disputes between the parties which are not relevant to the determination of the rent. All references to those disputes have not been included in these reasons as they fall outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to determine the rent.

17. The only issue which is relevant is the question of photographs which the [RESPONDENT] says are historic.

18. The Tribunal makes its determination on the information and evidence before it (together with where relevant its own knowledge of rent levels in the locality). In this case the [RESPONDENT] produces no evidence to prove the photographs are not a true representation of the condition of the property today.

19. On the evidence before it the Tribunal determines that all three applications are dismissed and that it will proceed on the basis of the papers originally submitted.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 20. Tribunal Directions dated 11th February 2022.

21. [RESPONDENT]: Tribunal Reply Form.

22. Tenant: Application Reply Forms and additional documents, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement.

[RESPONDENT]'s Representations (summarised): 23. The [RESPONDENT] says in the Reply Form and attachments:

a) The following works had been undertaken 2017: Tiled bathroom 2018: Re-rendered house 2020: Replaced rear gutter 2021: Damp treatment and new boiler

b) Damp in the kitchen is being monitored.

c) Kitchen and Bathroom are in good condition and were in place when the house was bought in 2016.

24. The property is located near major local employers and on a main bus route.

4

25. Market Rent: A local agents suggests £1,250.00 pcm in the market today. A schedule of local properties available to rent is included showing asking rents ranging from £1,000.00 (smaller property) to £1,400.00 pcm.

26. Undated photographs are included.

Tenant's Representations (summarised)

27. The Tenant says in the Application and Reply Forms:

a) Tenant: Refreshed decorations, changed floor covering in hall, renovated outside toilet, refixed moving floorboards and refreshed toilet unit and sink cabinet. b) Defects include: Wet walls in kitchen, living room and bathroom, rotten windows, broken bath screen. c) Tenant replaced the fridge in 2019 and paid for repairs to the washing machine. d) Repairs undertaken by the [RESPONDENT] include: Bedroom 1 and Kitchen: wet plaster covered with plasterboard and Boiler replaced (2021).

28. Undated photographs are included evidencing damp and poor decorations.

29. The documentation includes copies of correspondence in late summer 2020 from The Private Housing Services Department of Bristol City Council highlighting issues at the property including: 1: Damp and Mould 2: Structural collapse and falling elements (boundary wall)

30. No market rent evidence was submitted.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 31. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

32. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant or [RESPONDENT] are not relevant to this issue.

33. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at E expiring on 29th September 2030. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.

34. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

35. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the [RESPONDENT] could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by

5

having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £1,200.00 pcm.

36. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property determined to make deductions in respect of issues identified by the Tenant:

a) Poor kitchen and bathroom fittings: £100.00 b) Disrepair (mainly damp and impact on decoration): £100.00 c) Tenant provision of fridge: £5.00

Total deduction £205.00 pcm

37. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £995.00 pcm.

38. The rent will take effect from 6th February 2022 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 39. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

40. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,200.00 per calendar month for a similar modernised property in fair condition.
  • The Tribunal reduced the rent by £100.00 per calendar month due to poor kitchen and bathroom fittings.
  • The Tribunal reduced the rent by £100.00 per calendar month due to disrepair, mainly damp and its impact on decoration.
  • The Tribunal reduced the rent by £5.00 per calendar month because the tenant provided the fridge.
  • The landlord did not provide evidence to prove that the tenant's photographs were not a true representation of the property's current condition.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's application to decline the landlord's proposed increase due to ongoing repair issues was dismissed.
  • The landlord's application stating the tenant agreed to the increase and that issues were resolved was dismissed.
  • The tenant's second application to decline the increase, acknowledging she would accept if repairs were done, was dismissed.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £995.00 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the current market conditions and the condition of the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and the current market rent levels were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the current market conditions and the condition of their property when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property and evidence of repairs were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.