Tribunal Sets Assured Periodic Tenancy Rent at £1,400
📌 In brief
In this case, a tenant challenged their landlord's proposal to increase the rent to £1,400 per month. After considering the evidence, the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided to set the rent at £1,400 per month, effective from July 4th, 2022.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant may challenge a landlord's proposed rent increase under the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. Additionally, the tribunal can disregard certain factors when setting the rent, such as the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in the property's value due to improvements made by the tenant, and reductions in value due to the tenant's non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1,400.00 per month.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal decided to set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1,400.00 per month, effective from 4th July 2022, following an application by the tenant challenging the landlord's proposed increase under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/18UC/MNR/2022/0072
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Exeter, Devon, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] & [NAME] c/o [APPELLANT], 50-51 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1400.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 04 July 2022
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 04 September 2019
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Floor covering, cooker, fridge and washing machine.
8. Description of premises Modern 3 storey end terrace house
[NAME] of Decision 25 July 2022
1
Case Reference
: CHI/18UC/MNR/2022/0072
Property : [ADDRESS], Exeter, Devon [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
(Tenants)
Respondent: [redacted]
[RESPONDENT] (Landlord)
Date of Application : 27th June 2022
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] Mr N Robinson FRICS
Date
: 25th July 2022
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 25th July 2022 will be £1,400.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 4th July 2022.
2. By an application dated 27th June 2022, the Tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 16th May 2022 proposed a rent of £1,400.00 pcm with effect from 4th July 2022, in place of the current rent of £1,295.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 4th March 2021. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 6th July 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in a mainly residential area close to the city centre with access to all amenities.
8. The property comprises a Three storey double glazed centrally heated end terrace house.
9. The accommodation comprises: Living Room, kitchen, bathroom and 3 bedrooms (one with en suite shower). Outside: Courtyard garden and garage.
10. The property is let unfurnished with floor coverings, cooker, fridge and washing machine.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 12. Tribunal Directions dated 6th July 2022.
13. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.
14. Tenant: Application, Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement.
Landlord's Representations (summarised):
15. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and attachments: a) A schedule of expenditure in maintaining the property between April 2021 and July 2022.
3
b) The property is well maintained with all safety certificates.
16. As to rental value the Landlord says:
a) The cost of everything has increased. b) The Tenant’s have been in occupation since September 2019 and the rent has not been increased since March 2020. c) Works needed have been carried out promptly. d) Three nearby comparables are provided showing rents between £1,500 and £1,650.00 pcm. e) This is justified, the agent is managing another property in the same cul de sac at a rent slightly higher than £1,400.00 pcm.
Tenant's Representations (summarised)
17. The Tenant says in the Application and Reply Forms:
a) The is no central heating or double glazing. There is a dishwasher but not washing machine. b) The Tenant changed the sink in the toilet on the 3rd Floor in May 2021. c) The condition of the house is the same as when the tenancy commenced.
18. The Tenants say that neighbours in a 3 bedroom house nearby are paying £1,050.00 pcm and a 4 bedroom house £1,300.00 pcm.
Rent from September 2019 to March 2020 £1,275.00 Mar 2020 to March 2022 £1,295.00.
19. Photographs are attached which show marks on carpets, a broken back gate and the driveway.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations
20. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
21. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [NAME] are not relevant to this issue.
22. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at D expiring on 2nd March 2025. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
23. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
24. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open
4
market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £1,400.00 pcm.
25. The Tribunal looked at the factual difference in the party’s submissions and concluded:
a) The difference in rental terms between having a dishwasher or a washing machine was negligible. b) From the EPC certificate (2015) the Tribunal noted that the property was both double glazed and centrally heated. The Landlord’s schedule refers to replacing the heating control unit.
26. The Tribunal considered the rental evidence of both parties and concluded that little weight could be placed on the Tenant’s evidence of rents of adjoining properties as no details were given as to whether the tenancies included furnishings and the dates on which those rent were agreed and whether the tenants were in occupation at the time as opposed to being agreed in the market place.
27. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make no deduction in respect of any of the issues identified.
28. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £1,400.00 pcm.
29. The rent will take effect from 4th July 2022 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 30. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
31. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
5
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £890.00 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: Property Condition Matters
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1,100.00 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £850.00 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy After Review
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant challenges the proposed rent increase under the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant requests a rent determination reflecting the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant seeks a reasonable rent level based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant demands a fair rent assessment based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant asks for a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and inventory.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's challenge under sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was dismissed.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1,400.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in this case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the evidence presented by both parties and the Tribunal's own knowledge of market rent levels.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The Tribunal considered the condition and inventory of the property, as well as the market rent levels for similar properties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, who brought the case to challenge the proposed rent increase.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can challenge a proposed rent increase if they believe it is unreasonable.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as the tenancy agreement, the landlord's schedule of expenditure, and photographs of the property were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if they wish to contest the decision on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
