VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, a tenant challenged a landlord's proposed rent increase for an assured periodic tenancy. The First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £1,050.00 per month, effective from May 22, 2022, after considering the property's condition and market comparables.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant may refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the Tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancynotice of rent increase

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This applies to periodic tenancies where the periods match those of the original tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy following a dispute over a proposed increase.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy after the tenant referred a landlord's notice of rent increase under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £1,050.00 per calendar month, effective from May 22, 2022. The Tribunal considered the property's condition, market comparables, and the proposed increase.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UM/MNR/2022/0055

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 11 [NAME], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

[RESPONDENT] [NAME] 58 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1050.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 22 May 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 22 October 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the [RESPONDENT] & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by [RESPONDENT] or superior [RESPONDENT] coverings and white goods.

8. Description of premises Flat in Grade II listed Mill converted into Flats.

[NAME] of Decision 20 July 2022

1

Case Reference

: CHI/29UM/MNR/2022/0055

Property : 11 [NAME], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

(Tenants)

Respondent: [redacted] : 15th May 2022

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]

: 20th July 2022

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background

1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 20th July 2022 will be £1050.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 22nd May 2022.

2. By an application dated 15th May 2022, the Tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the [RESPONDENT] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The [RESPONDENT]'s notice dated the 16th April 2022 proposed a rent of £1,074.00 pcm with effect from 22nd May 2022, in place of the current rent of £995.00 pcm.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 22nd October 2021. The tenancy is subject to the [RESPONDENT]'s repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the [RESPONDENT] and Tenant Act 1985.

Property and Inspection

5. Following the Directions dated 9th June 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in the market town of Faversham close to shops and amenities with fast rail link to London.

8. The property comprises a Third and Fourth Floor Flat in a Grade II listed building part double glazed centrally heated with allocated parking space and communal gardens.

9. The accommodation comprises: Hallway, Living Room, kitchen, 2 double bedrooms, shower room, understairs storage, galleried landing and 2 large eaves store rooms. Outside: Allocated parking space and communal gardens.

10. The property is let unfurnished with cooker/hob, fridge and washing machine.

11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal

12. Tribunal Directions dated 9th June 2022.

13. [RESPONDENT]: Tribunal Reply Form.

3

14. Tenant: Application Notice of Increase and Tenancy, but did not complete the Reply Form.

[RESPONDENT]'s Representations (summarised):

15. The [RESPONDENT] says in the Reply Form and attachments: a) The flat was completely refurbished before the current tenants moved in (new kitchen fittings except washing machine and oven and redecorated throughout). b) The [RESPONDENT] is responsible for the service charge which includes window cleaning and share of communal garden maintenance. c) Photographs are included in the Reply Form.

16. As to rental value the [RESPONDENT] says Flats in [NAME] rarely come onto the market and the last relet, subject to references, took place within 2 days of advertising.

17. There are no comparable properties on offer in Faversham. [NAME] is highly sought after location in a conservation area. [NAME] is located in the centre of Faversham.

18. The proposed increase of 8.00% is in line with inflation. In central Faversham 2 bedroom properties with parking are offered for £1,1,00.00 to 1,200.00 pcm. Without parking between £900.00 and £1,200.00 pcm.

Tenant's Representations (summarised)

19. The Tenant made no submissions as to the property or rental value.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations

20. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

21. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing [RESPONDENT] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant or [RESPONDENT] are not relevant to this issue.

22. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at C expiring on 26th April 2031. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.

23. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

24. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the [RESPONDENT] could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by

4

having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £1,050.00 pcm.

25. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property determined to make no deductions in respect of disrepair or other defect. However the Tribunal noted the Tenant had made no submission but the [RESPONDENT] had apparently agreed relet the property after advertising at £1,050.00 pcm.

26. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £1,050.00 pcm.

27. The rent will take effect from 22nd May 2022 being the date specified by the [RESPONDENT] in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law

28. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

29. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal [NAME] to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination reflecting the property's condition and market comparables.
  • A landlord cannot unreasonably increase rent without considering the property's condition and market comparables.
  • The tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent level based on the property's condition and market comparables.
  • A tenant may challenge a landlord's proposed rent increase under the Housing Act 1988.
  • A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and market comparables.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent increase if it reflects the current market conditions and the property's condition.
  • A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market value of the property, taking into account its condition and location.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1,050.00 per month, effective from May 22, 2022.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition, market comparables, and the proposed increase, setting the rent at £1,050.00 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's condition and market comparables to determine a reasonable rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, who successfully challenged the landlord's proposed rent increase.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can challenge a landlord's proposed rent increase by referring it to the Tribunal under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence and documents related to the property's condition, market comparables, and the proposed rent increase mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law only.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.