VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: Property Condition Matters

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal adjusted the rent for an assured tenancy based on the property's condition and lack of modern facilities. The rent was set at £1,150.00 per calendar month, effective from 23 July 2022.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent deduction based on the property's condition and modernisation needs.

Topics

rent adjustmentproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, the tribunal will determine a reasonable rent that a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market, considering the terms of the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the rent due to the property's condition and lack of modern facilities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal adjusted the rent for an assured tenancy based on the property's condition and lack of modern facilities. The rent was set at £1,150.00 per calendar month, effective from 23 July 2022.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UG/MNR/2022/0079

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY] c/o [COMPANY], 40-41 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1150.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 23 July 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 23 June 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets, curtains, fridge and cooker.

8. Description of premises 1930’s 3 bedroom terrace house.

[NAME] of Decision 8 September 2022

1

Case Reference

: CHI/29UG/MNR/2022/0079

Property : 22 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

(Tenants)

Respondent: [redacted]

c/o [COMPANY] of Application : 8th July 2022

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]

: 8th September 2022

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 8th September 2022 that the rent will be £1,150.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 23rd July 2022.

2. By an application dated 8th July 2022, the Tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The landlord's notice dated the 8th June 2022 proposed a rent of £1,200.00 pcm with effect from 23rd July 2022, in place of the current rent of £1075.00 pcm.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 23rd June 2021. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 9th August 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in a mainly residential area south of the B2175 close to the town centre. Local amenities are available and include access to Ebbsfleet International, Gravesend and Northolt railways stations and local bus stops.

8. The property comprises a double glazed centrally heated terrace house.

9. The accommodation comprises: 2 Reception Rooms, kitchen, bathroom and 3 bedrooms. Outside: Gardens and garage.

10. The property is let unfurnished with floor coverings, fridge and cooker.

11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 12. Tribunal Directions dated 9th August 2022.

13. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.

14. Tenant: Application Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement and Building Surveyor’s report.

Landlord's Representations (summarised): 15. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and attachments:

3

a) The property was painted and new carpets laid before the Tenant moved in. b) Apart from installing a cooker no updates have been carried out in the last 5 years.

16. As to rental value the Landlord’s agent refers to Rightmove’s Best Price Guide between 1st May and 19th August 2022 within 0.5 mile radius of [POSTCODE]. Comparables of properties let agreed or available at rents ranging from £1,200.00 to £1,450.00 pcm are presented but not analysed to the subject property.

Tenant's Representations (summarised) 17. The Tenant says in the Application and Reply Forms:

a) Photographs showing damp on the internal face of the bay window, black mould in the bathroom, collapsing plaster on the kitchen ceiling, carpet torn by rats, broken joints in bathroom tiling. b) There has been no improvement since the tenancy commenced. c) Repairs are needed: Bathroom, kitchen, and mould around the house.

18. The Tenant says that if the Landlord repaired the property, the rent would be around £1,150.00 to £1,200.00 pcm. See advert from Rightmove. The Tenant however proposes £1,130.00 which has been rejected.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 19. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

20. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [NAME] are not relevant to this issue.

21. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at D expiring on 5th April 2027. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.

22. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

23. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £1,300.00 pcm.

4

24. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make deductions in respect of issues identified:

a) General disrepair : £50.00 b) Lack of modern bathroom: £50.00 c) Lack of modern kitchen: £50.00

Total deduction £150.00 pcm

25. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £1,150.00 pcm.

26. The rent will take effect from 23rd July 2022 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 27. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

28. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal [NAME] to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's condition is taken into account when determining the rent.
  • Market comparables are used to set a reasonable rent level.
  • Tenants can challenge proposed rent increases under the Housing Act 1988.
  • Rent adjustments are made based on the property's condition and inventory.
  • Current market conditions influence the final rent level.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The rent level does not sufficiently consider the property's condition and location.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for the assured tenancy was adjusted to £1,150.00 per calendar month, effective from 23 July 2022.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and lack of modern facilities, reducing the proposed rent from £1,200.00 to £1,150.00 per month.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the need for modernisation.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be able to negotiate a lower rent based on the condition of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property's condition and the tenant's representations regarding the property's condition mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.