First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £850.00 PCM for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured tenancy, setting it at £850.00 per month. They considered the property's condition and compared it to similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent level based on the property's condition and market comparables.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy. The tribunal will determine a reasonable rent level based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and market comparables.
This section implies a covenant by the landlord to keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, along with certain installations for utilities and heating, in repair and proper working order. However, the landlord is not required to carry out repairs unless they affect the tenant's enjoyment of the property or common parts.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for a property at £850.00 pcm after considering the property's condition and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured tenancy at £850.00 pcm, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables. The decision was made in the context of a Notice under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UN/MNR/2022/0112
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [APPELLANT] Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY] 71 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 850.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21 October 2022
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 21 May 2011
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Part floor coverings cooker.
8. Description of premises 2 bedroom ground floor flat with garage.
[NAME] of Decision 19 December 2022
1
Case Reference
: CHI/29UN/MNR/2022/0112
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
(Tenants) C/o Helping Others Powers
Encouragement
Respondent: [redacted]
(Landlord)
Date of Application : 26th September 2022
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] [NAME] [APPELLANT]
: 19th December 2022
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 19th December 2022 that the rent will be £850.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 21st October 2022.
2. By an application dated 26th September 2022, the Tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 6th September 2022 proposed a rent of £850.00 pcm with effect from 21st October 2022, in place of the current rent of £750.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 21st May 2011. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 12th October 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in an established residential area within easy access of the town centre and railway station.
8. The property comprises a self contained ground floor flat in a centrally heated double glazed two storey building.
9. The accommodation comprises: Living room, kitchen, bathroom, separate w.c. and 2 bedrooms. Outside: garden and garage.
10. The property is let unfurnished with some floor coverings and a cooker.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 12. Tribunal Directions.
13. Landlord: Brief undated statement with an email dated 21st November 2022.
14. Tenant: Application Reply Forms, Notice of Increase, Tenancy Agreement and a number of undated photographs.
Landlord's Representations (summarised):
15. The Landlord says:
3
a) There have been 4 rent increases in the rent since 2011 which are not considered to be unreasonable. b) The property is a large 2 bedroom flat with garden and garage, which is 5 minutes to the railway station and 10 minute walk to the town centre and beach. c) The Landlord is not aware of any maintenance issues.
16. As to rental value the Landlord suggests the current rent for properties in this area is £1,100.oo pcm but currently the rent for this property is £850.00 pcm.
Tenant's Representations (summarised)
17. The Tenant’s representative says in the Application and Reply Forms: a) Replaced garden fence in 2019. b) New boiler was fitted 2014 under a government disrepair grant.
18. Works carried out by the Landlord: Rewire (2021), Basin, tap and flooring in bathroom (2022).
19. Disrepair: a) Mould in both bedrooms. b) Bedroom 1: walls and ceiling cracked, . c) Bedroom 1, 2 and bathroom: peeling paint. d) Bathroom: damp patch on ceiling and radiator rusty. e) W.C radiator not useable and rusty. f) Kitchen: Crack in ceiling and kitchen not touched by Landlord in last 12 years. g) Living room windows do not shut properly. h) Broken tiles around windows.
20. No safe disabled access to the property or aids fitted within the property (especially bathroom and w.c.).
21. As to the proposed rent there are no comparables due to current rentals all being renovated or refurbished to a high standard whereas the subject property has had no refurbishment/renovations in 12 years.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 22. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
23. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.
24. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at D expiring on 2nd March 2031. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
25. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
4
26. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings and all white goods and garage and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £950.00 pcm.
27. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make deductions in respect of issues identified:
a) General disrepair (as shown in the photographs) and lack of modernisation : £100.00
28. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £850.00 pcm.
29. The rent will take effect from 21st October 2022 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 30. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
31. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
5
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: Property Condition Matters
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1,100.00 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £890.00 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Assured Periodic Tenancy Rent at £1,400
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £670.00 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £700.00 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's location near the town centre and railway station supported a higher rental value.
- The property's features, including a garden and garage, contributed to its market value.
- The Tribunal determined that a deduction was necessary due to the property's general disrepair and lack of modernisation.
- The market rent for a modernised property in fair condition with good facilities would be £950.00 pcm.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured tenancy at £850.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the comparison to similar properties in the area were crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set based on the condition of their property and market comparables.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and statements from both the tenant and landlord were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
