VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The Tribunal ruled that the rent should stay at £650 per month, effective from 1 December 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the market rent for their assured periodic tenancy determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

tenancy determinationmarket rent assessment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering factors such as the type of tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and the terms of the existing tenancy. Additionally, certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance are disregarded when determining the rent.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The Tribunal found that the rent should remain at £650 per month, effective from 1 December 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00HB/MNR/2024/0643

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] Judge Rai

Landlord [NAME] 184 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 650.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 December 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced January 1991

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Wardrobe, bed, chest of drawers

8. Description of premises Single room with shared facilities within HMO of 8 bedsits

[NAME] of Decision 10 February 2025

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/00HB/MNR/2024/0643 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlords : Mr [COUNSEL] : [RESPONDENT] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] Judge C Rai Date of Application : 26th November 2024 Date of Decision :

10th February 2025

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £650 per calendar month with effect from 1st December 2024.

HAV/00HB/MNR/2024/0643 2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 25th October 2024 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £800 per month in place of the existing rent of £650 per month to take effect from 1st December 2024.

2. On 26th November 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord. Neither party offered any evidence of comparable rents. Determination and Valuation 5. Having given consideration to the submission provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £650 per calendar month.

6. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £650 per month.

7. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.

8.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £650 per month should take effect from 1st December 2024 this being the date specified in the notice.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the market rent.
  • The Tribunal considered the written submissions provided by the tenant.
  • The Tribunal determined the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition to be £650 per calendar month.
  • The new rent was set to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice because the tenant did not claim undue hardship.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision determined that the market rent for the assured periodic tenancy should remain at £650 per month.

Who was involved?

The case involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the written submissions provided by the tenant and its own knowledge of rental values in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the tenant's submission regarding the current market conditions and rental values.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek the First-tier Tribunal to determine a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from the tenant and publicly available information on rental values in the area were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal this decision within a month by requesting full reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.