VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination for Tenant's Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent for a tenant's property, setting the rent at £540 per week after considering the property's condition and amenities. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination based on the property's condition and amenities.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new period for the tenancy starting at least two months after the notice is served. If the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can only occur after a specific time frame, which varies depending on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on various factors including the periods of the tenancy, the terms of the tenancy, and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to the Act.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property based on its condition and amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £540 per week for a tenant's property, considering the property's condition and amenities. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AG/MNR/2025/0767

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 25 March 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME]

Date of Summary Reasons

: 12 August 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £540 per week with effect from 8 February 2025. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On 6 February 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 168.11 exclusive of services in place of the existing rent of £ 163.70 per week to take effect from 7 April 2025.

2. On 21 March 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 25 March 2025

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord. No rental evidence was provided by either party.

5. The tenant queried a number of service charge items listed in the notice and accompanying letter. On this application the jurisdiction of the tribunal is to fix a market rent and the tribunal has no jurisdiction over service charges. These must be challenged on an application under s27 A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Determination and Valuation

6. No comparable evidence has been proved by the parties and the tribunal has relied on of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £600 per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. No central heating , carpets, curtains or white goods.

3 7. The full valuation is shown below:

8. The Tribunal determines a rent of £540 per week

9. Decision

10. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £540 per week.

11. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £540 to take effect on [6 February 2025 This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

12. The tribunal notes that the rent paid by the tenant is a social rent which can only be increased by the rise in the Consumer Prices Index plus 1%. The jurisdiction of the tribunal is limited to finding a market rent and it has no power over the level of a social rent. It is the lower figure of social rent and market rent which is due from the tenant.

Chairman: [NAME]: 12 August 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

PW AST Market rent 600.00 £ less condition/terms 10.0% 60.00 -£ 540.00 £

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AG/MNR/2025/0767

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [NAME] [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], Speke L24 8 RF

Tenant Ms C [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 540 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 6 February 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 10 January 2000

6. Length of the term or rental period weekly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none

9. Description of premises Third floor purpose built flat with 2 bedrooms, living room, kitchen and bathroom. The flat is double glazed. Central heating was provided by the tenant as are carpets curtains and white goods. There is garage parking.

[NAME] of Decision 12 August 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent determination reflects the property's condition.
  • The rent determination considers the property's market value.
  • The rent determination is based on local rental comparisons.
  • The rent determination adjusts for specific conditions of the property.
  • The rent determination is based on the terms of the tenancy.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The rent determination is based solely on comparable properties without considering the property's condition.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £540 per week for the tenant's property.

Who was involved?

The tenant challenged a proposed rent increase by the landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and amenities, setting a market rent of £540 per week.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition and amenities of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also challenge a proposed rent increase through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from the tenant and the tribunal's own expert knowledge of rental values in the area mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed according to the procedures outlined in the judgment.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.