Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Damp Conditions
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a tenant should pay a lower rent because the property had significant damp issues. The Tribunal inspected the property and found it unfit for the open market due to the dampness.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property condition prevents it from being offered in the open market.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to damp conditions in the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a reduced rent of £391.00 per month due to damp conditions in the property, adjusting the landlord's proposed rent of £409.56 per month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/00CN/MNR/2024/0644
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant(s)
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [NAME] of Application : Determination of a Market Rent under sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME]
Judge David R Salter
Date of Decision : 6 June 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £391.00 per calendar month (to include service charges of £40.48 per calendar month), with effect from 13 January 2025. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 25 November 2024, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) which proposed a new rent of £409.56 per calendar month (pcm) (to include service charges of £40.48 pcm), in place of the existing rent of £381.85 pcm (including service charges of £39.15 pcm), to take effect from 13 January 2025. The original tenancy commenced on 13 September 1999.
2. By an application received on 4 December 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Act, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties, an inspection of the Property and having regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
Inspection
4. The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the Property on 6 June 2025. The subject Property comprises a ground floor studio flat in a building that the Tribunal understands was a converted convent, which contains in excess of 20 flats of various sizes. There are communal grounds and car parking.
The subject Property itself offers the following accommodation:
Entrance hall with access off to open plan space incorporating kitchen, living and dormitory areas and separate shower room with wash hand basin, low flush WC and cubicle with electric shower.
Heating is via wall mounted electric heaters and windows are secondary double glazed.
Carmelite Grange is situated in the suburb of Yardley approximately 5 miles to the west of Birmingham City Centre. There are neighbourhood services within walking distance of the building.
Condition
5. Immediately upon entering the Property, the Tribunal members noted a strong pervading damp smell particularly in the open plan area. Kitchen and bathroom fittings would appear to date from the grant of the original tenancy in 1999.
3 Submissions of the Parties
The Tenant
6. The Tenant returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms which indicated that he had provided the carpets and curtains and white goods to the Property.
7. In addition, the Tenant stated that the Property was damp, and the rent determined should reflect this.
The Landlord
8. The Landlord did not provide any submissions.
Determination and Valuation
9. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the majority of achieved rentals appear to be in the order of £400.00 to £585.00 pcm for house shares or single person accommodation although many of these appear to include “bills” – ie utility charges. Therefore, the Tribunal adopts, as a starting point, the rental of £480.00 pcm for the Property.
10. From this level of rent, a deduction has been made in relation to the damp issue that is evident in the Property which in the opinion of the Tribunal is serious such that it would prevent the Property being offered in the open market in its current condition. The adjustments made to the starting rental are, therefore, as follows:
a) Condition generally but particularly in relation to the damp issue as identified by the Tribunal’s inspection. b) White goods, carpets and curtains as provided by the Tenant. c) Tenant’s decorating liability at 5% of rental.
The full valuation is shown below:
pcm Market Rent
£480.00
Less a) Items given under a) above
£50.00
b) Items given under b) above
£15.00
c) Items given under c) above
£24.00 £89.00
Say
£391.00
4 Decision
17. Therefore, in the absence of an application for hardship under section 14(7) of the Act, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £391.00 per calendar month (to include service charges of £40.48 pcm) with effect from 13 January 2025.
Chairman: [NAME]
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
5
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2024/0644
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Judge David R [NAME]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £391.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 13 January 2025
3. The amount included for services is £40.48 Per month
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 13 September 1999 5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises One bedroom studio flat
[NAME] of Decision 6 June 2025
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £950 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines New Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Disputed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal reduced the rent due to a strong damp smell in the property, particularly in the open plan area.
- The property's condition, especially the damp issue, was serious enough to prevent it from being offered on the open market.
- A deduction was made for the tenant's decorating liability, calculated at 5% of the rental value.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to reduce the rent due to damp conditions in the property.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the rent after inspecting the property and finding significant damp issues.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The damp conditions in the property were the main reason for reducing the rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation could argue for a reduced rent if their property has significant damp issues.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the inspection report and the damp conditions observed in the property.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on any point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
