Tribunal Grants Exemption From Energy Supply Consultation Requirements
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted Origin Housing Limited's request to bypass certain consultation requirements for a new energy supply agreement. The decision was based on the reasonableness of the exemption under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may be exempted from statutory consultation requirements for a qualifying long-term agreement if it is reasonable to do so.
📖 What the law says
The First-tier Tribunal can decide to waive consultation requirements for qualifying works or long-term agreements if it finds it reasonable to do so. Qualifying works refer to work done on buildings or other premises, while a qualifying long-term agreement is an agreement lasting over twelve months made by or on behalf of the landlord or a superior landlord.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted Origin Housing Limited's a person to dispense with consultation requirements for a long-term energy supply agreement.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) granted an application by a landlord to dispense with consultation requirements for a long-term agreement regarding the supply of energy to communal areas and individual properties. The decision was based on the reasonableness of the exemption under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2018
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AM/LDC/2019/0174 Applicant : [redacted] Respondents : [redacted] in various regions Properties : Various properties in various locations owned and managed by [COMPANY] of [NAME] : [NAME] to dispense with consultation requirements in relation to a qualifying long term agreement; under section 20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal Members : Judge [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 11 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 11 December 2019
DECISION The Tribunal grants the [NAME] for dispensation from further statutory consultation in respect of a qualifying long-term agreement in relation to the supply of energy (electricity and gas) to the communal areas of most of its housing stock and, in some cases, the supply to individual properties.
2 REASONS
The [NAME] 1. The Applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the Act”) dispensing with statutory consultation in respect of a qualifying long-term agreement in relation to the supply of energy (electricity and gas) to the communal areas of most of its housing stock and, in some cases, the supply to individual properties.
2. The Applicant is the freeholder and landlord of the various properties and the Respondents are the leaseholders of the same.
3. The [NAME], made by [COMPANY] was received by the Tribunal on 7 October 2019. The Directions (as subsequently amended by the Tribunal) were issued by the Tribunal on 17 October 2019. The Directions listed the matter for a paper determination for the week commencing 9 December 2019, unless any party made a request for a hearing. There was no request for a hearing. The documents provided to the tribunal by the Applicant include a witness statement by Mr [APPELLANT[NAME].
4. The [NAME] seeks dispensation in respect of a qualifying long-term agreement in relation to the supply of energy (electricity and gas) to the communal areas of most of its housing stock (approximately 6,700 residential units) and, in some cases, the supply to individual properties. It is intended that the agreement will start on 1 July 2020, on expiry of its current utility supply contracts on 30 June 2020 and will last for three years. The anticipated value of the contract is £5,000,000, which the Applicant states equates to £248.76 per unit per year (although it states that this will be subject to some variance on various factors specific to individual buildings; such as thermal efficiency, size and amount of lighting). The Applicant states that in the majority of cases the cost per unit will exceed £100 per unit, the threshold above which consultation is required.
5. The Applicant has requested dispensation so that it may take advantage of the cost savings to be achieved if it can accept a tender within a very short timeframe. The Applicant intends to use a tendering process to invite [NAME] to join a framework agreement. This will be followed by a ‘call off’ procedure (a mini tender) under the framework agreement inviting the identified [NAME] to respond to an “Invitation to Quote”. The Applicant states that it is in the nature of ‘call off’ competitions in utility tenders that [NAME] are given 5 days in which to respond to the ‘call off’. The [NAME] ordinarily hold the tariffs they provide for no more than one day, which effectively means that it is impossible to carry out section 20ZA consultation. The Applicant has been advised that if it were to require the tariffs to be fixed for an extended period of time, to permit the section 20ZA consultation, the [NAME] would not respond or would apply an uplift of up to 30% on their tariffs. Further the Applicant wishes to have the flexibility to enter into a contract on short notice to take advantage of favourable tariffs, which it would
3 be prevented from doing if it had to follow the section 20ZA consultation process. The Applicant has requested urgent dispensation from consultation as the value of the contract is such that it will have to be advertised in the Official Journal of the European Union (“OJEU”) and it will take time to run an OJEU tender, create the framework agreement, run the mini-competition under the framework agreement and arrange for the utility supply.
6. The Applicant has confirmed that a Notice of Intention has been sent by first class post to all the Respondents. In his witness statement Mr [NAME] submits that the purpose of the Notice of Intention is to advise the Respondents of the nature and requirements of the proposed contract, invite observations and invite nominations for alternative contractors and that the Notice of Intention provided to all the Respondents did all these things.
7. The Directions invited any Respondent/leaseholder who opposed the [NAME] to submit a response form to the Tribunal and to make any statement of response to the Applicant by 18 November 2020. There were no representations received by the Tribunal from any of the Respondents and the Applicant confirmed to the Tribunal that it had not received any representations in response to the Tribunal’s Directions.
Determination and reasons
8. Section 20ZA(1) of the Act provides:
“Where an [NAME] is made to a leasehold valuation tribunal for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements.”
9. Having considered the Applicant’s submissions and the evidence it provided, that it had notified the Respondents of its intention to apply for dispensation, the Tribunal considers it reasonable to determine that the Applicant may dispense with the consultation requirements of section 20ZA of the Act in relation to the supply of energy (electricity and gas) to the communal areas of most of its housing stock and, in some cases, the supply to individual properties.
10. In reaching its decision the Tribunal has taken into account the decision in [COMPANY] v [NAME] and others [2013] UKSC 14.
11. This decision does not affect the Tribunal’s jurisdiction upon any future [NAME] to make a determination under section 27A of the Act in respect of the reasonable cost of the qualifying long-term agreement.
12. As directed in paragraph 9 of the Tribunal’s Directions the Applicant should now add this decision to its website and confirm to the Tribunal that it has done so.
4
Name: Judge Pittaway Date: 11 December 2019
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
3. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £2,067.60 Lift Repair Dispensation Without Statutory Consul…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Gas Supply Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants £950/year Gas and Electricity Contracts Without Full Consul…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) London Borough of Camden Granted Dispensation for Energy Procurement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Energy Supply Contracts
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Energy Supply Contracts in Seventeen Shelt…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Emergency Repair Exemption
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Management Company Allowed to Bypass Consultation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Exemption From Statutory Consultation R…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal grants dispensation for longer-term energy contract in Romiley
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Urgent Fire Safety Measures Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Landlord Dispensation for Long-Term Energy Contr…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord notified leaseholders of its intention to apply for dispensation, meeting statutory requirements.
- The consultation process would be impractical due to the short timeframe and potential loss of favorable tariffs from suppliers.
- The value of the contract exceeds £100 per unit, typically requiring consultation but the court found it reasonable to dispense with this requirement.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant Origin Housing Limited's a person to dispense with consultation requirements for a long-term energy supply agreement.
Who was involved?
A landlord (Origin Housing Limited) and approximately 6,700 households (leaseholders).
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that it was reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 20ZA.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that it was reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements due to the nature of the energy supply agreement and the need for flexibility in securing favorable tariffs.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek an exemption from consultation requirements if they can demonstrate the reasonableness of such an exemption.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included a witness statement by Mr a person a person and the a person itself.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to consult a solicitor for advice on how to proceed with a case like this.
