VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £24,960 per year after considering various factors affecting the rent. The capped rent, as per the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, is £28,097.50 per year.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for specific conditions and capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Topics

fair rent determinationadjustments for property conditions

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, adjusting for various factors and applying the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £24,960 per annum for a property, adjusting for the tenant's repair and decoration liability, lack of white goods, and unmodernised condition. The capped rent according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is £28,097.50 per annum.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AG/F77/2024/0249

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mrs [APPELLANT]

Landlord The [APPELLANT]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £24,960 Per annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 15 October 2024

3. The amount for services is - Per -

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

- Per -

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ .................................................................................................................................................................... per .................................. including £ ...................... per ................................ for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 28,097.50 ..................... per annum ............................................................................................................. including £ ......................................... per ................................ for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 15 October 2024

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 389.9

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 334.6

X 389.9 Minus Y 334.6 = (A) 55.3

(A) 55.3 Divided by Y 334.6 = (B) 0.165271967

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) n/a

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.215271967

Last registered rent* £23,120 Multiplied by (C) = £28,097.09 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £28,097.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £28,097.50 Per annum

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable

service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair re

Case Reference

: LON/00AG/F77/2024/0249

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [NAME] [APPELLANT]

Landlord : The [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 24 June 2024

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 15 October 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £24,960 per annum will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 15 October 2024, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £3,250 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

The Tenant’s repair and decoration liability. No provision of white goods under the tenancy. No provision of curtains or floor coverings under the tenancy. Unmodernised property and damp issues in the basement.

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar month Market Rent

£3,250

Less Tenant’s repair and decoration liability ) 5% No white goods

) 5% No floor covering / curtains

) 5% Unmodernised and damp

) 5%

20%

£650

£2,600

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£520

£2,080

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £2,080 per calendar month and this equates to £24,960 per annum.

Decision

8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £24,960 per annum. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £28.097.50 per annum. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £24,960 per annum is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 15 October 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Fair rent is adjusted for specific conditions of the property.
  • Fair rent is capped according to statutory guidelines.
  • Fair rent takes into account the property's condition and amenities.
  • Fair rent considers the scarcity of similar properties.
  • Fair rent is calculated based on the Retail Price Index (RPI).

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair rent of £24,960 per year for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and the tenant's responsibilities to determine the fair rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the property's condition and the tenant's responsibilities was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also have their rent adjusted based on the property's condition and their responsibilities.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from the tenant and the landlord's absence of written submissions mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.