First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £8,400 per year. They considered the property's condition and local market conditions to determine the fair rent.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the state of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property considering its condition and local market conditions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £8,400 per year for a property, considering its condition and local market conditions, under the Rent Act 1977.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AS/F77/2024/0244
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 104A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT]
Tenant [RESPONDENT]
1. The fair rent is £8400 Per year (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 9 October 2024
3. The amount for services is
Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
Per
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £11,092.50 per year prescribed by the Order.
Chairman E [NAME] of decision 9 October 2024
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 389.9
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 320.2
X 389.9 Minus Y 320.2 = (A) 69.7
(A) 69.7 Divided by Y 320.2 = (B) 0.217676
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.267676
Last registered rent* £8750 Multiplied by (C) = £11,092.16 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £11,092.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £11,092.50 Per year
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the
variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference : LON/00AS/F77/2024/0244
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 104A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 19 March 2024
Type of Application : Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 9 October 2024 Hearing remote on the papers
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
This has been a hearing on the papers which has not been objected to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because, no-one requested the same and I determined that the matter could be dealt with on the papers. The documents that I was referred to were in an electronic bundle the contents of which I have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 9 October 2024 is £8,400 per year.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Background
1. The landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £10,500 per year for the above property.
2. The registered rent at the date of the application was £8,750 per year which had been registered by the rent officer on 24 February 2022 with effect from 28 April 2022.
3. On 14 March 2024, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £8,069 per year with effect from 28 April 2024.
4. The landlord objected to the registered rent on 19 March 2024.
5. The tribunal issued Directions on 15 August 2024. Written representations were received from the landlord and copied to the tenant, no representations were received from or on behalf of the tenant.
The Evidence
6. The property is a first floor flat above commercial premises, comprising three rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc. The landlord confirmed that the property was unmodernised, the windows were single glazed and there was no central heating. He stated that two bedroom flats in the vicinity let for between £1,350 and £1,850 per month. There was a shortage of housing stock and a growing demand which had pushed up prices. He was of the opinion that the proposed rent of £10,500 per year reflected the condition of the flat and scarcity in the area.
The Law
7. When determining a fair rent the tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. The Tribunal is unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent.
8. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised:
That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and
That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property.
Valuation 9. In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. I took into account the landlord’s evidence and my own general knowledge of rents within [NAME] and concluded that if the flat were in a purpose built block in the busy main road position it would let at £1,350 per month.
10. However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £1350 per month to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £475 to reflect the of the flat over commercial premises, the access to the flat was via a rear entrance, the lack of modernisation, double glazing, central heating, carpets curtains and white goods and difference in terms and conditions.
11. This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £875 per month. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar properties in Greater London and therefore made a deduction of approximately 20% from the adjusted market rent to reflect this element. The uncapped fair rent is £700 per month (£8,400 per year).
Decision
12. The uncapped fair rent initially determined for the purposes of section 70, is below the maximum fair rent of £11,092.50 per year calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore, the rent will not be capped under the provisions of the Order.
19. Accordingly, the sum of £8,400 per year will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 9 October 2024 being the date of my decision.
Chairman: [NAME]: 9 October 2024
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application- for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent at £195 per week under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Residential Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Capped Fair Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Capped Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Based on Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £265.50 as fair rent for protected tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at Maximum Level Under Rent Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The effective date for the new fair rent is 9 October 2024.
- The property's market rent was adjusted downwards due to its location above commercial premises and lack of modern features.
- A deduction was made from the adjusted market rent due to substantial scarcity of similar properties in Greater London.
- The determined fair rent was below the maximum fair rent allowed by the 1999 Order, so it was not capped.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a fair rent of £8,400 per year for a property.
Who was involved?
A landlord and a tenant were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and local market conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the local market conditions.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local market conditions when seeking a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence regarding the property's condition and local market conditions mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
