First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission to a landlord to bypass the usual consultation process for urgent repairs at a property. The repairs were deemed necessary due to a risk to life and no tenants objected to the application.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to dispense with statutory consultation requirements if there is a risk to life and no opposition from tenants.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tribunal to grant permission to skip certain consultation requirements if it deems it reasonable to do so. The consultation requirements refer to rules set by the Secretary of State regarding providing information to tenants about proposed works or agreements.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent repairs.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal granted dispensation from the consultation requirements under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent repairs at a property. The decision was based on the risk to life and lack of opposition from tenants.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AJ/LDC/2024/0171 Property : 1-44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [APPELLANT]) [COMPANY] Respondents : [redacted] :
None
Type of Application :
For dispensation from the consultation requirements under Section 20ZA Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal :
Mr [APPELLANT] (Hons) LLM Property Law MA FRICS
Date of Decision : 14 May 2025
DECISION
This has been a remote paper determination, which has been consented to by the parties. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, and no one requested same.
The documents the Tribunal were referred to were in a bundle of some 113 pages.
Decision
(1) The Tribunal determines that unconditional dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements from Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the Act) in respect of the property 1-44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]. (2) We make no determination as to the reasonableness of the costs of same, these being matters which can be considered, if necessary, under the provisions of s27A and s19 of the Act. The Application 1. This Application received 19 June 2024, is made by [NAME] of [COMPANY]) [COMPANY], on behalf of, the freeholder, [COMPANY].
2. The Application seeks dispensation from the consultation requirements under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
3. The Application is concerned solely with the question of what consultation if any should be given of the consultation requirements of Section 20 of the 1985 for works costing in excess of £250 per flat. It is not concerned with the reasonableness or payability of any service charges which may arise. The Determination 4. A written Application was made by [COMPANY]) [COMPANY]. The tribunal considered the written bundle of 113 pages, in support of the Application. Background The property 5. The Property comprises a modern apartment block consisting of 44 apartments built above an underground carpark.
6. The Application is made for “qualifying works”. The Form notes under “Grounds for Seeking Dispensation”; specifically, “on 7 June 2024, the
Applicant instructed a contractor, “[COMPANY]” to undertake repairs to the Automatic Opening Ventilation System at the Property, to replace the Uninterruptable Power Supply battery backup.” 7. The Application Form notes in the urgency being caused by “risk to life” and so “the Applicant considered it necessary to carry out the works without completing statutory consultation.” 8. The Directions dated 5 July 2024, provided for the tenants to be given copies of the Application form, a brief statement to explain the reasons for the Application and display a copy of the directions in a prominent place in the common parts of the property. This to be done by the 19 July 2024 and the Tribunal notified as such by the 21 July 2024.
9. The Directions also note that any [NAME] who opposes the Application should by the 2 August 2024 complete the reply form and return it to the Tribunal. The Landlord may by the 9 August 2024 provide a brief reply to any [NAME] who opposes the Application.
10. The Landlord confirmed to the Tribunal by email dated 24 July 2024 that compliance with the Directions had been carried out. By email dated 7 August 2024 contained in the Bundle [21] , [NAME] of [COMPANY] confirmed that no [NAME] had opposed the works or application.
11. The only issue for the Tribunal is whether or not it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements of Section 20 of the 1985 Act. This Application does not concern the issue of whether any service charge costs will be reasonable or payable. Documents 12. The Tribunal has had recourse to the Bundle of 113 pages which includes the Application form, Directions, quotations and a copy of a specimen lease. The Tribunal’s decision 13. The Tribunal grants dispensation under Section 20 ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Service Charges (Consultation) (England) 2003 for the works set out in the Application.
14. We are, aware of the judgment in [COMPANY] v [NAME] [2013] UKSC 14. The Application for dispensation is not challenged.
15. The Supreme Court (Lord [NAME] at para 50) accepted that there must be real prejudice to the tenants. Indeed, the Respondents do not oppose the Application. It is accepted that we have the power to grant dispensation on such terms as we think fit. However, the Landlord is entitled to decide the identity of the contractors who carry out the work, when they are done, by whom and the amount. The safety net for the Respondents is to be found in Sections 19 and 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
16.
Accordingly, we find that unconditional dispensation should be granted.
17. Our decision is in respect of the dispensation from the provisions of s20 of the Act only. It is open to the [NAME] or others to apply under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Section 27A, should there be concerns over the payability and reasonableness of the service charge, these may include concerns over necessity, quality of work and its cost. [NAME]: [NAME]
14 May 2025
ANNEX – RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written Application for permission must be made to the First-Tier at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The Application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the Application.
3. If the Application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such Application must include a request to an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the Application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The Application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (ie give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the Application is seeking
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Lift Repairs Exceeding £250 Per…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Emergency Works Exemption
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Building Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Emergency Roof Repairs Dispensation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Emergency Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission for Urgent Health and Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- There is a significant risk to life.
- The landlord faces no opposition from tenants.
- Emergency works are necessary and urgent.
- Works exceed £250 in value.
- There is real prejudice to tenants due to urgent works.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the landlord to bypass the consultation requirements for urgent repairs.
Who was involved?
The landlord and various leaseholders of the property were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant dispensation because the repairs were urgent and necessary due to a risk to life, and no tenants objected.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Section 20ZA and the Service Charges (Consultation) (England) 2003 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the risk to life and the lack of opposition from tenants.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be able to bypass consultation requirements if the repairs are urgent and necessary due to a risk to life.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the urgency of the repairs and the lack of opposition from tenants.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
