Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) granted dispensation from consultation requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent roof repairs at a property in London. The decision was made due to the urgent nature of the work needed to prevent water ingress into flats.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to dispense with statutory consultation requirements if there is real prejudice to tenants due to urgent works.
📖 What the law says
The appropriate tribunal can grant a request to waive consultation requirements for certain works or long-term agreements if it determines that waiving these requirements is reasonable.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent roof repairs at a property in London. The decision was based on the urgency of the works to prevent further damage.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AW/LDC/2023/0110 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [NAME] ([COMPANY] Respondents : [redacted] Representative : Not represented Type of Application : For dispensation from the consultation requirements under section 20ZA Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal :
Mr [APPELLANT] (Hons) LLM Property Law MA FRICS
Date of Decision : 26th September 2023
DECISION
This has been a remote paper determination, which has been consented to by the parties. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, and no one requested same.
The documents the Tribunal were referred to were in a bundle of some 60 pages.
Decision
The tribunal determines that dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements from section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the Act) in respect of the property 34-36 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]. The application 1. This Application is made by the freeholder [COMPANY], dated 14th April 2023.
2. The Application seeks dispensation from the consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
3. The Application is concerned solely with the question of what consultation if any should be given of the consultation requirements of section 20 of the 1985 for works costing in excess of £250 per flat. It is not concerned with the reasonableness or payability of any service charges which may arise. The determination 4. A written Application was made by the freeholder [COMPANY]. The case was decided on paper and no appearances were made. The tribunal considered the written bundle of 60 pages, in support of the Application. Background 5. The property comprises; “a masonry/brick building. Consisting of residential flats, named A-V".
6. The Applicant in this case is the freeholder of the property.
7. This Application has been issued because, as per the application form at” Grounds for Seeking Dispensation”
8. “urgent works are required to be undertaken to prevent current water ingress into 2 properties”
9. A building consultant/surveyor attended the site with a roofing contractor to discuss what was needed to be done straight away to prevent damage to the property further. One of the two flats affected has needed to remove their bedroom ceiling due to the water damage. Long term, a full roof replacement is required however these works have been suggested as a
short-term fix to resolve the issues whilst long term works are saved for and will be around 3-5 years.
10. Total costs including VAT were indicated at £25,995.50.
11. “No consultation has been carried out due to the urgency of needing these works to be undertaken. Quotes were obtained and the cheaper of the two was instructed to be undertaken on 14th April.”
12. “We did not undertake the usual section 20 consultation process. The properties being affected by the water ingress from the damaged roof could not wait for section 20 process to be completed. Works have to be done urgently to fix the issue.”
13. The Directions dated 10th July 2023, provided for the Applicant to send to the leaseholders and any sub lessees and any [NAME], a copy of the application form, a brief explanation of why the application has been made and a copy of the directions, by 21st July 2023.
14. The Directions also note that any leaseholder who opposes the Application should by the 24th July 2023 completes the reply form and return it to the tribunal. Any leaseholders who oppose the application shall by 7th August complete a reply form and email it to the applicant and the tribunal.
15. There is confirmation the Directions have been complied with by virtue of e mail dated 11th July 2023 from [NAME], and that no evidence of opposition from any leaseholder.
16. The only issue for the tribunal is whether or not it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory consultation requirements of section 20 of the 1985 Act.This application does not concern the issue of whether any service charge costs will be reasonable or payable. Documents 17. The Bundle comprises the application form, directions, an e mail to leaseholders providing them with a copy of the application and directions, and an example of lease. The tribunal’s decision 18. The tribunal does grant dispensation under section 20 ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Service Charges (Consultation) (England) 2003 for the works set out in the application.
19. We are, aware of the judgment in [COMPANY] v Benson and others [2013] UKSC 14. The application for dispensation is not challenged.
20. The Supreme Court (Lord [NAME] at para 50) accepted that there must be real prejudice to the tenants. Indeed, the Respondents do not oppose the application. It is accepted that we have the power to grant dispensation on such terms as we think fit. However, the Landlord is entitled to decide the identity of the contractors who carry out the work, when they are done, by whom and the amount. The safety net for the Respondents is to be found in sections 19 and 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
21. The tribunal finds that the work is of an urgent nature and accordingly, find that dispensation should be granted. [NAME]: [NAME] 26th September 2023
ANNEX – RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-Tier at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
3. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request to an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (ie give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission to Skip Consultation for Urgent Lift Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Emergency Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Emergency Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Electrical Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Permission for Urgent Health and Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Electrical Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Emergency Repairs Approved Without Full Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Emergency Works Exemption
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Lift Replacement Works
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The works were urgent and needed to prevent ongoing water damage to two properties.
- One flat had already suffered significant water damage, requiring the removal of its bedroom ceiling.
- The leaseholders did not oppose the application for dispensation from consultation requirements.
- The tribunal found that the work was urgent, justifying the dispensation.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for urgent roof repairs.
Who was involved?
A landlord applied for dispensation, while leaseholders were not represented but did not oppose the application.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal decided that the work was of an urgent nature and granted dispensation to prevent further damage to the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Service Charges (Consultation) Regulations 2003.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency of the works to prevent further water damage to flats was the central reasoning for granting dispensation.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing urgent works can apply for dispensation from consultation requirements if there is real prejudice to tenants due to the urgency of the work.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The building consultant's report and quotes obtained for the repair works were key documents.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an application for permission to appeal must be made within 28 days to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
