First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord's request to bypass certain consultation requirements for works in a property. This decision was made under specific conditions outlined in the judgment.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may obtain dispensation from consultation requirements if certain conditions are met.
📖 What the law says
The First-tier Tribunal can grant a landlord dispensation from consultation requirements if it determines that it is reasonable to do so. Consultation requirements refer to obligations set by the Secretary of State through regulations, which may include providing details of proposed works or agreements to tenants, obtaining estimates, inviting tenants to suggest additional estimators, considering tenant observations, and giving reasons for certain actions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal granted dispensation from consultation requirements for certain works in a property.
📜 Headnote Official document
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord's application for dispensation from the consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for certain works in a property. The decision was based on the specific conditions outlined in the judgment.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : BIR/41UE/LDC/2022/0031 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative : Mr [COUNSEL] (counsel) instructed by [COMPANY], Solicitors Respondents : [redacted] [ADDRESS] listed on the Appendix Representative : Mr [COUNSEL] (counsel) instructed by [NAME], Solicitors
Type of application : Application under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for dispensation of the consultation requirements in respect of qualifying works Tribunal member : Judge C [NAME] and place of hearing : 30 November 2022 by video hearing Date of decision : 7 December 2022
DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
2
UPON the Landlord’s application dated 20 September 2022 pursuant to section 20 ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the Act”) seeking dispensation with the requirement to comply with the consultation requirements pursuant to s.20 of the Act in relation to:
A. Works to repair fans connected with the fire alarm in the Property in the sum of £21,674.40 (including VAT) (“the Fan Works”)
B. Works to conduct fire door remedial and fire-stopping works within the Property (“the Remedial Fire Works”)
C. Works carried out by [NAME] [NAME] in carrying out the EWS Report dated October 2022 and the Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls Report dated November 2022 (including the EWS1 Form) in the sum of £25,200 (including VAT) (“the AH Works”).
Hereafter referred to as “the Application”
AND UPON a letter dated 29 November 2022 from the Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service by which the Enforcement Notice dated 8 March 2021 was withdrawn.
AND UPON the tenants of flats 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 25 and 26 being jointly represented by [NAME] (“the Represented Tenants”) and consenting to dispensation as set out below.
AND UPON the tenant of Flat 1 consenting to the Application
AND UPON the tenants of Flats 3, 4, 17, 20 and 24 having been served with the Application.
AND UPON the tenant of Flat 3 having been represented by [NAME] but no longer being represented by the said solicitors.
The tenants of all the flats in the Property are hereafter collectively referred to as “the Tenants”
AND UPON the Landlord no longer seeking dispensation from the consultation requirements in relation to the Remedial Fire Works, as it will now undertake the consultation pursuant to s.20 of the Act in relation to those works as soon as reasonably practicable.
AND UPON hearing [COUNSEL], counsel for the Landlord and [COUNSEL], counsel for the Represented Tenants
3 The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of s.20 of the Act in respect of the following works (“the Works”) on the conditions set out below (“the Conditions”):
The Works
1. The Fan Works;
2. The AH Works;
3. The works carried out by [NAME] in carrying out the Fire Stopping Survey dated January 2022.
The Conditions
1. The Landlord will not be entitled to recover any costs of the Application as a service charge or administration charge under the terms of the leases of the Tenants.
2. The Landlord will pay a contribution towards the Represented Tenants’ legal costs of the Application in the sum of £12,500 plus VAT.
Judge C Goodall Chair First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
Appeal
Any appeal against this decision must be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Prior to making such an appeal the party appealing must apply, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal within 28 days of the date of issue of this decision (or, if applicable, within 28 days of any decision on a review or application to set aside) identifying the decision to which the appeal relates, stating the grounds on which that party intends to rely in the appeal, and stating the result sought by the party making the application.
4 List of Respondents
1. [NAME] 2. [NAME] [NAME] 3. [NAME] and [NAME] [NAME] 4. [COMPANY] 5. [NAME] and [NAME] 6. [NAME] and [NAME] 7. [NAME] 8. R G ([COMPANY] 9. [NAME] 10. [NAME] and [NAME] 11. [NAME] and [NAME] 12. [NAME] 13. [NAME] 14. [NAME] and [NAME] 15. [NAME] (flats 15 and 23) 16. [NAME] 17. [NAME] 18. [NAME] 19. [NAME] 20. [COMPANY] 21. [NAME] 22. [NAME] 23. [NAME] 24. [NAME] 25. [NAME]
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Electrical Works Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Facility Management Consultation Dispensation Granted by First-tier Tribuna…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Drainage Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Sewage Pump Replacement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Emergency Lift Repairs Approved Without Full Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for New Electricity Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Major Works on Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Dry Rot Treatment Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Emergency Repairs Dispensation
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord demonstrates that it is reasonable to obtain dispensation from consultation requirements.
- The landlord shows that the statutory conditions for dispensation are met.
- The landlord proves that appropriate conditions are satisfied to obtain dispensation.
- The landlord establishes that they are entitled to dispensation under certain conditions.
- The landlord argues that obtaining dispensation is reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that led to a decision against the landlord in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the landlord's request for dispensation from consultation requirements for certain works in a property.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenants of the property were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the dispensation based on the specific conditions set forth in the judgment.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the necessity of the works and the conditions set for the dispensation.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek dispensation from consultation requirements if they meet the necessary conditions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence and documents related to the necessity of the works and the conditions for dispensation were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving property law.
