First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenant
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent of £650 per month for a tenant. The decision was based on the local rental values in Hadleigh, Suffolk, as determined by the Tribunal.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a market rent determination based on local rental values.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, provided the period begins at least two months after the notice is served.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new rent based on market conditions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £650 per month for a tenant based on local rental values in Hadleigh, Suffolk. The decision was made in response to a notice under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference
: CAM/42UB/MNR/2025/0727
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [COUNSEL]
: [NAME]
Landlord
: [NAME] and Mid Suffolk
District Council
Date of Application : 8 August 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] of Hearing : 3 November 2025 remote on the papers
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £650 per calendar month with effect from 1 September 2025. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
REASONS
Background
1. On 9 July 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £650 per month in place of the existing rent of £595 per month to take effect from 1 September 2025.
2. On 8 August 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Evidence
3. The tenant stated that the flat which is on the ground floor, comprises two rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc. The landlord had provided the white goods. The windows are single glazed and the heating is via electric radiators consequently it was expensive to heat.
4. The landlord provided a summary of the rent increases which had taken place since the start of the tenancy in June 2022 and noted that the proposed rent was still below that being paid for other ground floor flats within the development.
Determination and Valuation 5. As neither party provided any rental evidence I have relied upon my own general knowledge of rental values in Hadleigh. I am of the opinion that the open market rent of the flat, situated close to the High Street is £650 per month.
Decision
6. I therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £650 per month.
. 7. I direct the new rent of £650 per month to take effect on 0n 1 September 2025 in accordance with the date in the landlord’s notice.
Chairman: [NAME]: 3 November 2025
3
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
I. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-application-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper- tribunal-lands-chamber II. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
III. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
IV. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.
Appendix Housing Act 1988
14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and
4 (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable
5 for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements…. (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.
6
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2100 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £945 per Month by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenant Considering Property Condition and…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant disagrees with the landlord's proposed rent increase.
- The rent is set at a fair market value based on local rental values.
- The rent takes into account the condition and location of the property.
- The rent is adjusted for any financial hardship faced by the tenant.
- The tenant requests a determination by the First-tier Tribunal under Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £650 per month for the tenant.
Who was involved?
The tenant applied for a market rent determination, and the landlord proposed a new rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on local rental values in Hadleigh, Suffolk.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 13 and Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the local rental values in Hadleigh, Suffolk.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can apply for a market rent determination based on local rental values.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the landlord's proposal for a new rent and the local rental values.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving market rent determinations.
