Rent Set for Assured Shorthold Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Judgment
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a six-month assured shorthold tenancy and who is responsible for repairs. The rent was set at £1100 per month, effective from October 15, 2023.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination and repair allocation under an assured shorthold tenancy agreement.
📖 What the law says
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the landlord to keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, along with certain installations for utilities and heating, in repair and proper working order.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy and allocated liability for repairs.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal set the monthly rent at £1100 for a six-month assured shorthold tenancy, effective from October 15, 2023. It also allocated responsibility for repairs according to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/32UB/MDR/2024/0001
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Shorthold Tenancies (Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 22
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 19 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tribunal Judge A Davies Tribunal Member P Mountain
Landlord [NAME] and [NAME] C/o [NAME], P O Box 1241, Spalding, [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1100.00 Per month
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 October 2023
3. Date assured shorthold tenancy commenced 4 September 2023
4. Length of the term or rental period 6 months
5. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
6. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Undisclosed
7. Description of premises Detached 3 bedroomed house, Garden and garage.
Chairman A M Davies Date of Decision 13 February 2024
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £1900/month rent for assured tenancy in London
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Deci…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £500/Month Rent for Assured Tenancy in Manchester
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Judgm…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £935/month rent for assured tenancy in popular village
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Damage
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £680 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in Barnsley
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £625/month rent for assured tenancy in Hetton le Hole
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £620 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in Huddersfield
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition and value of their property.
- The tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent based on the condition of the property and local market conditions.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent at £1100 per month for a six-month assured shorthold tenancy and allocated repair responsibilities.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenant were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 22 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Section 11 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument about the appropriate rent amount and repair responsibilities was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their tenancy agreement includes clear terms for rent and repairs.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving tenancy agreements.
