Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Damage
📌 In brief
A tenant requested a lower rent due to property damage. The First-tier Tribunal agreed, reducing the rent to £595.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition and value of their property.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide on a rent that a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The decision takes into account the condition and value of the property, excluding factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to the tenant's non-compliance.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal reviewed a property damaged by rising damp and inadequate ventilation, adjusting the rent from £725 to £595.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BL/MNR/2024/0108
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises
The Tribunal members were 406 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Judge A M Davies Mr A Hossain, MRICS
Landlord [COMPANY]
25-27 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] 39 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £595 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24 April 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
4. Date periodic/statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 24 January 2018
5. Rental period monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises C1900 mid-terrace, 2 bedroomed, garden
Chairman A M Davies Date of Decision 1 October 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BL/MNR/2024/0108 Property : 406 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] : Section 14, Housing Act 1988: Market Rent Tribunal Members : Tribunal Judge A M Davies Tribunal Member A Hossain, BSc (Est Man) MRICS Date of Decision : 1 October 2024
REASONS for
DECISION 1. The Tribunal inspected [ADDRESS], Bolton on 1st October 2024 in the presence of the Applicant Ms [APPELLANT] and [NAME], from the [NAME].
2. The Tribunal’s visit was made following Ms [APPELLANT]’s application for the Tribunal to fix a market rent for the property. She had received a notice from the Landlord requiring an increase in rent from £450 to £725 per month. The notice was dated 20 March 2024 and the new rent was to start on 24 April 2024. Ms [APPELLANT] did not agree that the proposed rent represented the correct market rent for her property. 3. [ADDRESS] is a mid-terrace house built of brick under a slate roof around 1900. There is a small garden area to the front and an enclosed rear garden. The property has double glazing, gas central heating and all mains services. There is a living room
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 and dining kitchen on the ground floor, and 2 bedrooms and a bathroom on the first floor.
4. The tenancy began on 24 January 2018, when the rent was £425 per month. The landlord did not provide white goods, window coverings or furniture.
5. On inspection, the Tribunal found that there was significant amount of rising damp in the front and side walls. On the ground floor the injected DPC appeared to have failed. The Tribunal noted plants growing in the gutters and areas where roof slates had moved and sagged. There was evidence of penetrating damp and problems with mould at ground and first floor level. The Tribunal were told that in very wet weather this led to dripping water in the rear bedroom.
6. The bathroom fittings included an over-bath shower. There was no window. A small fan provided extraction of damp air apparently into the loft, and the Tribunal considered ventilation in the bathroom to be inadequate.
7. The double glazed units were fitted with trickle vents but the Tribunal were told that these were not working. The UPVC front door was not weathertight. Lino flooring in the kitchen had lifted and was worn. Part of the garden fence consists of stones which are leaning and were thought to be potentially dangerous. Pointing at the property was defective in places, adding to the damp problems in the house.
8. On the basis of its professional knowledge of rents in the area, the Tribunal noted that the market rent for a two bedroomed property in good letting order in the BL3 area was approximately £725. From this, the Tribunal made the following deductions: for non-provision of white goods and curtains: £20 pm; for the lack of repair noted above: £110 pm. This resulted in a current market rent of £595 for the property.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant requested a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
- The court recognized the tenant’s right to a rent adjustment due to the property's condition.
- Each case resulted in an allowed outcome, reinforcing the pattern.
- The property's condition was deemed unsatisfactory by the tenant.
- The value of the property was considered alongside its condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to reduce the rent from £725 to £595 due to property damage.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court visited the property and considered its condition, leading to a rent reduction.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the property was in poor condition and needed a rent adjustment.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to get a rent adjustment if they can prove property damage.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of property damage such as rising damp and inadequate ventilation was crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.
