Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £1890 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the current market value and the condition of the property compared to similar properties.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market value of a property, adjusted for its condition relative to comparable properties.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. The section also specifies when a new rent can be proposed again after a previous increase.
This section allows a tenant to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy. The tribunal then determines the open-market rent, considering various factors including the terms of the tenancy and disregarding certain effects like improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and disregarded tenant improvements.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a new rent of £1890 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account market conditions and the property's condition compared to similar properties.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MNR/2022/0207
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Flat B (Middle Flat), 90 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
[NAME] [RESPONDENT] 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ £1890 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20th April 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable n/a Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced April 2005
6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory periodic monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs landlord
8. Furniture provided by landlord or [NAME] n/a
9. Description of premises 1 doubled bedroom, one single bedroom, a living room, kitchen and bathroom first floor flat centrally heated, partial double glazing
[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Decision 20th April 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/OOBK/MNR/2023/0207 Property : Flat B (Middle Flat) 90 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In Person Respondent: [redacted] [RESPONDENT] : In Person Type of [NAME] : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : [NAME] MA [NAME] and venue of hearing : 20th April 2023 Hearing in [ADDRESS] of Decision : 20 April 2023
DECISION
Decision of the tribunal The tribunal determines the rent at £1890.00 per month with effect from 20th April 2023. Background 1. The tribunal received an [NAME] under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 received 28th November 2022. This included the landlord’s notice dated 21st October 2022 proposing a new rent to commence on 1st December 2022. The previous rent being £1450.00 per month and the proposed £1920.00 per month from 1st December 2022.
2. The assured tenancy which commenced in April 2005. The property comprises a first floor flat comprising two bedrooms, the smaller used as a study, living room, open plan kitchen and a bathroom.
3. On 13th January 2023 directions were given to determine this matter.
4. A hearing was held on 20th April where the [NAME] [APPELLANT] attended, and [RESPONDENT] attended on behalf of the Respondent. Representations from the Applicant tenant.
5. At the hearing the tenant set out their opposition to the rental increase in similar terms to his written submissions. The tenants' submissions comprised; A completed Reply Form. The Form notes the request for a hearing and an inspection.
6. The tenant notes that only half the flat has double glazing, and that the front reception room has single glazed Victorian sash windows only. The reply form at “improvements” notes issues with maintenance including boiler, windows, cracks caused by subsidence, issues of staining from water leaks, and execution of the works including dust.
7. Additionally, a separate submission dated 17th February 2023 which covers contextual matters in the landlord/ tenant relationship. All comments have been carefully noted. In the hearing the tenant with considerable care and clarity set out their position. They submitted the property was not of the same specification or order as other comparable properties. The accommodation was a one double bedroom with a second single bedroom with living room and kitchen and bathroom. This was confirmed on inspection by the tribunal,
That the property had been and continues to be their home since April 2005 and that roots had been put down in the community. Their proposal for rental level was £1450 per month and this derived from a combination of view of market, condition of property and what could be afforded.
8. Representations were also made in respect of hardship and the effective date of any rent increase. The tenant carefully explained their financial position noting that £1450 per month was the most they could afford. Representations from the Respondent landlord 9. The landlord submitted a completed Reply Form, noting they did not require an inspection nor a hearing. The form notes the landlord supplied central heating, double glazing, except front sash which have been recently refurbished, curtains and carpets. With white goods some purchased by tenant. Recently decorated throughout, recently replaced windows in bedrooms, a new boiler and common parts decorated. Landlord notes some outstanding work which they are [NAME] to carry out but agreement on time not reached with tenant at date of hearing. Noting also that specific works have been carried out to the bathroom and kitchen following previous tribunal decision. Also noting that rents have increased in area.
10. By separate submission, dated 21st February 2023 the landlord noted that average value for 2 bed flats in Saltram Cresent is £2450 to £2700 per month. The landlord requests £1920 per month to be determined. Evidence submitted of an opinion of value by [NAME] suggesting £2000 per month also included. Additional noting mortgage interest costs have increased considerably landlord suggesting at least 300%. The landlord presented their case succinctly and professionally.
11. In respect of the rent the landlord had taken their view of the market for a similar property in tip top condition and applied a discount of 20 per cent as identified in the last tribunal decision on the matter, thus reaching £1920 per month. They noted some repairs has been carried out including a replacement boiler. In respect of their hardship aspect they noted the increase in mortgage interest that has occurred recently. The Inspection
The tribunal inspected the property and found it in generally good condition the new boiler was noted with pipework yet to be boxed in around it. The windows to the street were large and single glazed. The property was clean and sound. The Law 12. In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 (the Act) the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy.
13. In so doing the Committee, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant’s improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Valuation 14. The tribunal considered the submissions of both parties; the condition of the property must be considered but disregarding any improvements by the tenant. The level of rent ascertained is set out by section 14 and personal circumstances cannot be taken into account.
15. The tribunal considering the representations of the parties and considering its own expertise values the market level of the flat if up to modern letting standards as £2100.00. The property is not at that level so deducts 10%, giving a value of £ 1890.00 per month. The tenant gave a detailed account of their financial hardship circumstances, for which the tribunal has great sympathy. This is accepted by the tribunal and the effective date of the increase is set at the date of the hearing. The Decision 16.The tribunal determines a rent of £1890 per month from 29th April 2023,
Name: [NAME]: 20th April 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
THE LEGISLATION Housing Act 1988 s.13.— Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies. (1) This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. (2) For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than— (a) the minimum period after the date of the service of the notice; and (b) except in the case of a statutory periodic [tenancy—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; (ii) in any other case, on the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; and ] (c) if the rent under the tenancy has previously been increased by virtue of a notice under this subsection or a determination under section 14[below—] [ (i) in the case of an assured agricultural occupancy, the first anniversary of the date on which the increased rent took effect; (ii) in any other case, the appropriate date. ] (3) The minimum period referred to in subsection (2) above is— (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months; (b) in the case of a tenancy where the period is less than a month, one month; and (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy. [ (3A) The appropriate date referred to in subsection (2)(c)(ii) above is— (a) in a case to which subsection (3B) below applies, the date that falls 53 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect; (b) in any other case, the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect. (3B) This subsection applies where— (a) the rent under the tenancy has been increased by virtue of a notice under this section or a determination under section 14 below on at least one occasion after the coming into force of the Regulatory Reform (Assured Periodic Tenancies) (Rent Increases) Order 2003; and (b) the fifty-third week after the date on which the last such increase took effect begins more than six days before the anniversary of the date on which the first such increase took effect. ]
(4) Where a notice is served under subsection (2) above, a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the notice unless, before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice,— (a) the tenant by an [NAME] in the prescribed form refers the notice to [the appropriate tribunal] ; or (b) the landlord and the tenant agree on a variation of the rent which is different from that proposed in the notice or agree that the rent should not be varied. (5) Nothing in this section (or in section 14 below) affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).
s.14.— Determination of rent by [tribunal] . (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to [the appropriate tribunal] a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the [appropriate tribunal]3 shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the [appropriate tribunal]3 consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. [
(3A) In [NAME] a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a [NAME] is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. (4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a [NAME], the [appropriate tribunal] shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. (6) In any case where— (a) [the appropriate tribunal] have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the [appropriate tribunal]9 propose to hear the two references together, the [appropriate tribunal] shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before [NAME] their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. (7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to [the appropriate tribunal] , then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by [the appropriate tribunal] (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to [the appropriate tribunal] that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the committee may direct.
(8) Nothing in this section requires [the appropriate tribunal] to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. (9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Norwich Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Northampton Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) FTT Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Ipswich Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Property Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Confirms Rent Increase for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Comparable Lettings
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent level reflects the open market value of the property.
- The rent is adjusted for the condition of the property.
- The rent takes into account comparable market rents.
- The rent considers the condition and fittings of the property.
- The rent is determined based on similar terms of the tenancy.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No specific factors identified as leading to dismissal in the given cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set a new rent of £1890 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, adjusted for its condition relative to similar properties.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property compared to similar properties in the market.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the market value and condition of their property when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition and comparable market rents were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
