VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The rent was set at £103 per week, starting from April 3, 2023, according to the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy to be £103 per week, effective from April 3, 2023, under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber File Ref No. CAM/22UH/MNR/2023/0033

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 13 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

[RESPONDENT] 1 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 103 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3 April 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 12 May 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period 12 months 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant liable for internal repairs

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A

9. Description of premises The Property comprises a ground floor flat within a two-storey retirement housing complex of 34 one-bedroom flats with a lift, lounge, resident management staff and guest facilities constructed in 1970.

The accommodation comprises a living room/kitchen, bathroom and a single bedroom. There is central heating and UPVC double glazing.

Chairman P [NAME] of Decision 27 June 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • There are no specific factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £103 per week.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988 to ensure a fair rent determination.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Ensuring a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should seek a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence related to the property and the tenancy agreement likely mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It's recommended to get legal advice from a solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.