VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenancy Tribunal Rules Tenant Must Pay Damages and Bond Repayment

Case No. [2026] NZTT 5465413

📌 In brief

In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal at Hamilton ruled that a tenant must pay damages to the landlord for failing to leave the rental property clean and tidy and causing damage beyond normal wear and tear. The ruling is based on the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is liable for damage to premises beyond fair wear and tear if they cannot prove otherwise.

Topics

tenancy disputesdamage liability

Provisions

Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 40(2)(a)Residential Tenancies Act 1986, s 49B

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This section outlines a tenant's responsibilities, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, and leaving it in a similar condition when moving out, with all rubbish removed.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The claimant was awarded damages and bond repayment for breach of tenancy obligations.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal at Hamilton ruled that the tenant must pay damages to the landlord due to breach of tenancy obligations, including leaving the premises unclean and causing damage beyond fair wear and tear. The decision was based on the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5465413 1

[2026] NZTT 5465413

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT HAMILTON | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI KIRIKIRIROA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [RESPONDENT] must pay [APPELLANT] $7,834.62 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

2. The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $568.00 (3297407-022) to [APPELLANT] immediately.

Description Landlord Tenant Rubbish removal $597.67 Repairs: to kitchen cabinet $115.00 Replace furnishings: bathroom mirror $201.25 Repairs: to wardrobe $138.00 Replace furnishings: towel rail $86.25 Repairs: fence $172.50 Repairs: deck $201.25 Repairs: to walls and doors $1,006.25 installation and replacement curtains $837.86 Carpet Cleaning $287.50 Cleaning $450.00 Window repairs $330.63 Repairs: to bathroom plumbing $350.46 Replacement of kitchen cabinetry $3,600.00 Filing fee reimbursement $28.00 Total award $8,402.62 Bond $568.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $7,834.62

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5465413 2

Reasons:

1. Only the applicant landlord attended the hearing. The tenant did not attend in person and could not be contacted by telephone.

2. The landlord has applied for compensation, refund of the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

3. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

4. The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish. The carpets were stained and required professional cleaning.

5. The bathroom mirror was missing at the end of the tenancy.

6. The amounts ordered are proved.

Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?

7. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.

8. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.

9. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA.

10. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5465413 3

applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.

11. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. [NAME] v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.

12. The itemised damage listed in the table above caused during the tenancy: . The damage is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.

13. The amounts ordered are proved.

14. I have taken into account betterment and depreciation when assessing the claims for replacement of curtains, repainting the damages walls and doors and replacing the kitchen cabinetry. The amounts ordered are reduced by 50% to ensure that the landlord is returned to the position they would have been in had the tenant not breached their obligations, and is not better off. In calculating depreciation, I have taken into account the age and condition of the items at the start of the tenancy and their likely useful lifespan.

[NAME]

03 June 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5465413 4

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5465413 5

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Tenant liability for damage beyond fair wear and tear is upheld.
  • Tenant must pay rent arrears after vacating property past due date.
  • Landlord entitled to recover unpaid rent, bond at tenancy end without early termination agreement.
  • Tenant responsible for costs incurred by landlord due to damage or excessive mess upon vacating.
  • Tenant must leave premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, and compensate for damage beyond fair wear and tear.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant must pay damages and bond repayment to the landlord.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant breached their obligations by leaving the property unclean and causing damage beyond fair wear and tear.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 40(2)(a) and 49B of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's failure to prove they did not cause damage beyond fair wear and tear was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Tenants may be liable for damages beyond normal wear and tear if they cannot prove otherwise.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of damage and breach of tenancy obligations was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, both parties can appeal the decision within 10 working days to the District Court.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for such cases.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.