VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £500 PCM

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a property under an assured tenancy, setting it at £500 pcm. They considered the property's condition and compared it to similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent based on the property's condition and market comparables.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancydisrepair

Provisions

Housing Act 1988 s.14Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for a property at £500 pcm after considering its condition and market comparables.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for a property under an assured tenancy at £500 pcm, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HG/MNR/2022/0089

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr R [NAME] [NAME] [APPELLANT]

Landlord [NAME] 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 500.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 August 2022

3. The amount included for services is £60.44 Per Calendar Month

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 August 2014

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets and white goods.

8. Description of premises 2 bedroom ground floor flat in converted house in need of repair and modernisation.

Chairman Mr R [NAME] of Decision 19 October 2022

1

Case Reference

: CHI/00HG/MNR/2022/0089

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

Date of Application : 24th July 2022

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] [APPELLANT]

Date

: 19th October 2022

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 19th October 2022 that the rent will be £500.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 1st August 2022.

2. By an application dated 24th July 2022, the Tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The landlord's notice dated the 28th June 2022 proposed a rent of £550.00 pcm with effect from 1st August 2022, in place of the current rent of £450.00 pcm including £60.44 pcm in respect of water charges.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and commenced on 1st August 2014. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 30th August 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in a residential area on the eastern side of Plymouth within walking distance of the city centre and in close proximity to bus stops.

8. The property comprises a centrally heated double glazed Ground Floor Flat in a converted terrace house.

9. The accommodation comprises: Living/Dining Room, kitchen, shower room separate w.c. and 2 bedrooms. Outside: shared use of garden. No garage or off street parking.

10. The property is apparently let furnished but no inventory has been provided (a cooker, fridge, washing machine and freezer are identified on the Landlord’s Reply Form).

11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 12. Tribunal Directions.

13. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.

14. Tenant: Application Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement and Building Surveyor’s report.

3

Landlord's Representations (summarised):

15. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and attachments: a) The tenancy commenced in 2012. b) The tenants do not abide by their duty of care. The humidistat was damaged by the tenants causing a build of condensation with consequent damage to decorations as the flat is not properly ventilated. c) A third adult is occupying the flat without our consent. d) New central heating boiler installed in December 2021. e) New bathroom in November 2017. f) New living room carpet January 2020.

16. As to rental value the Landlords say that the proposed rent is well below the market which is at least £700.00 pcm. Details of 2 bedroom properties to let in the PL4 area are included advertised at rents between £680.00 and £900.00pcm.

Tenant's Representations (summarised)

17. The Tenant says in the Application and Reply Forms:

a) The Landlord’s gave consent for Mrs [RESPONDENT] son to live at the property. b) When the Tenants moved into the property it was in a ‘right mess’. c) With the agreement of the Landlords the Tenants decorated the interior. The Landlord paid for the materials. d) The Tenants replaced furniture, sofa, microwave, kettle, toaster and cutlery. e) The surveyors report which includes a photographic record. is dated 27th June 2022 and provides a schedule of work estimated at £12,150.00 plus VAT. f) The report identifies the following disrepair: Damp: Hall, living room, kitchen and both bedrooms. Woodwork: ill fitting doors and windows. Bathroom: damp, walls crumbling, shower base cracked and extractor not working. Externally: Damp

18. As to the proposed rent the Tenants say the £100.00 increase is not the problem but the state of repair is the issue.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 19. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

20. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [NAME], nor any dispute between them apart from the rent are not relevant to this issue.

21. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at D expiring 13th April 2032. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.

4

22. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

23. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £800.00 pcm including water charges.

24. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make deductions in respect of issues identified:

a) General disrepair together non compliance with statute as detailed in the surveyor’s report: £200.00 b) Dated kitchen and lack of modernisation: £100.00.

Total deduction £300.00 pcm

25. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £500.00 pcm.

26. The rent will take effect from 1st August 2022 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 27. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

28. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

5

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant challenges a rent increase based on the property's condition and market comparables.
  • The tenant requests a fair rent assessment considering the property's condition and market standards.
  • The tenant demands a reasonable rent deduction reflecting the property's condition and modernization needs.
  • The tenant seeks a rent determination that reflects the open market value of the property, considering its condition.
  • The tenant invokes the Housing Act 1988 to challenge the landlord's proposed rent increase.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for a property under an assured tenancy at £500 pcm.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) Regulations 2015 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and the market comparables were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and market comparables when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and market comparables were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.