VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a rented property. They took into account several factors, including the Retail Price Index, and used the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 to calculate the rent. The final fair rent was set at £1,086.50 per month, effective from 24 November 2025.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted according to the Retail Price Index and other relevant factors under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair rent determinationretail price indexmaximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, adjusting for various factors and applying the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair rent for a property, taking into account the Retail Price Index and other factors, and applying the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The decision was made on 24 November 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AF/F77/2025/0109

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 1086.50 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 24 November 2025

3. The amount for services is 56.72 Per month

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ 1152 .................... per month ....................... including £ 56.72 ............. per month ...................... for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ 755.50 ........ per week .......... including £ ......................................... per ................................. for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 24 November 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 407.4

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 331.7

X 407.4 Minus Y 331.7 = (A) 75.7

(A) 75.7 Divided by Y 331.7 = (B) 0.22822

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.27822

Last registered rent* 850 Multiplied by (C) = 1086.49 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 1086.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = 1086.50 Per month

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AF/F77/2025/0109

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr A [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 27 January 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Decision : 24 November 2025

Date of Summary Reasons

: 24 November 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £1,086.50 per calendar month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 24 November 2025, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection 2. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 3. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 4. Having had consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £1,600 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

Absence of white goods carpets and curtains provided by the landlord The tenant’s decorating liability

5. The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar month Market Rent

£1600

Less No landlord’s white goods, carpets and curtains ) approx. 10% Tenant’s decorating liability

)

£160

£1440

Less Scarcity

approx. 20%

£288

£1152

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,152 per calendar month.

3 Decision

8. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £1,152 per calendar month. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £1,086.50 per calendar month. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of £1,086.50 per calendar month is to be registered as the fair rent or this property, inclusive of services at £56.72 per month.

Chairman: [NAME]: 24 November 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was calculated by increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index.
  • An additional 5% was added because this was a second or subsequent application since February 1, 1999.
  • The calculated rent was rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
  • The Tribunal determined that the open market rent for the property was £1,600 per month.
  • Adjustments were made to the market rent due to the absence of white goods, carpets, and curtains provided by the landlord.
  • A scarcity adjustment of approximately 20% was applied to the rent.
  • The capped rent, calculated at £1,086.50 per month, was registered as the fair rent because it was lower than the uncapped fair rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set a fair rent of £1,086.50 per month for a rented property.

Who was involved?

The case involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Retail Price Index and other factors, using the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the calculation of the fair rent based on the Retail Price Index.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent that was lower than the uncapped fair rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined similarly, taking into account the Retail Price Index and other factors.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both the tenant and the landlord were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the details of how to appeal are usually provided in the full reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.